this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
660 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58839 readers
4961 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I hope this isn't a cartoony scheme driven by Apple honeydicking Arm with the M-series processors to tank PC and Android.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 minutes ago

Arm owner softbank wants more mulah, want line goes up.

Qualcomm thinks this is not allowed in their license contract.

Without having read the contract, I think Qualcomm has a strong case, seams arm wants this to be settled before court in December. Qualcomm also thinks they have a strong case, so they say let the courts begin.

But it doesn't matter if it's an American court, because Qualcomm is American, softbank is Asian, arm is European. So, you have home turf advantage

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 hours ago

Good. Qualcomm refuses to make it easy to run linux on their hardware. Instead they try to hide basic information about their processors and chips in the name of selling a license for every little thing.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

While every comment here seems to scream "end patents", arm has less patent bs than other tech (rounded corners) meant to sue/prevent use. Arm works hard on developing and improving architecture and designs to offer licenses at a compelling price. Qualcomm paying as much as other licensees should be preferable to Qualcomm than bankruptcy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 39 minutes ago

Qualcomm paying as much as other licensees should be preferable to Qualcomm than bankruptcy.

Not saying this is wrong, but where do you get it from? The article just states that ARM considers Qualcomm's acquisition of Nuvia a breach of license. Both companies held ARM licenses before. What's the issue with such a purchase?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

Yeah. The crowd rooting for Qualcomm has never worked with them

ARM has it's problems, but they aren't in the wrong here

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 hours ago

Truly yes, but RISC-V.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Tech patents are ridiculous. Let's end them or reduce them to 1-3 years with no renewal. Then all that's left is the specific copyright to the technology, not lingering webs of patents that don't make any sense anyway to anyone with detailed knowledge of the tech. All they're good for is big companies using legal methods to stop innovation and competition. Tech moves too fast for long patents and is too complex for patent examiners or courts to understand what is really patentable. So it comes down to who has the most money for lawyers.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago

Seeing things like "slide to unlock", "rounded corners", and "scroll bouncing" are all patentable is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but another big issue is that big companies can afford to bribe or buy out the patent holders in the first place. Ideally, the patent holders would benefit the most from everyone making their tech, but instead they benefit the most from one company being the exclusive manufacturer and highest bidder.

The act of an agreement asking a patent holder not to sell to other manufacturers in itself should be illegal.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, making patents nontransferable would solve that. Ultimately, getting rid of most would be good, but if we have to keep them, then they should be dissolved if a company fails or is bought out because obviously the patent itself wasn't enough to make a product that was viable. So everyone should get the chance to use the patent. The whole purpose of a patent vs keeping tech proprietary until the product is released was to benefit society once the patent expires. Otherwise, it makes more sense for companies to keep inventions secret if they aren't just stockpiling them like they do now.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

A risky move... Or should I say... A RISCV move...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

You should say that, yes, very hopefully much so.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

"risc architecture is gonna change everything"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It really did.

FYI, ARM stands for Advanced RISC Machines.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 minutes ago

And before that "Acorn RISC Machines".

We had Acorn Archimedes systems at school that ran RISC OS.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

It actually did, but not in a way people expected at the time that movie was made. It changed a lot underneath the hood.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

Hack the planet!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 13 hours ago

year of the linux riscv desktop

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Just when ARM devices were finally getting good…

[–] [email protected] 48 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

The amount of IP money grubbing in the IT industry is able to literally make millions out of sand, this is just more of it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

This seems like a tactic that might win a battle but lose the war. Reminds me of Unity.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 16 hours ago (49 children)

The free market is going very well here

load more comments (49 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›