Changing a party from the inside when its leadership is Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton is a tough ask. When push comes to shove every democrat falls in line for the center right candidate. Including the 'progressives'.
IndustryStandard
More reliable than New York Times.
Never trust a website. Check if they have receipts. In this case ei delivers.
Explains why the ICJ is so compromised.
This is OK
This is ridiculous
By providing big subsidies to green energy developement. Something the EU could also have done but refused to. And so they lost their entire lead.
Her teeth are very straight. A bit too straight for a 1910 woman.
Doctors are being raped to death under the democrats. The democrats still have two months to stop the genocide and prove themselves different.
Kamela never shunned Palestinians either
Sorry i did not realize this was a sarcastic troll chain.
Of course you are lying
SIF received renewed media coverage around 2020 when some columnists found that Tulsi Gabbard, a candidate for the Democratic nomination in the 2020 United States presidential election was associated with the SIF during her childhood, and even mentioned Butler as her spiritual guide in her school years.[1][10] Her father, Mike Gabbard, a Hawaii State Senator, noted for his opposition to same-sex marriage, too was associated with SIF; he viewed spirituality as a weapon against sexually deviant practices.[1][9][13][14] His wife, Carol Gabbard, was the treasurer of the SIF.[9]
Tulsi Gabbard has since clarified that she considered Mr. Butler "essentially like a Vaishnava Hindu pastor" during her school years [15][16] As a teenager, Gabbard moved away from SIF and "fully embraced Hinduism", and "follows the Vaishnava branch that believes in the Supreme Lord".[17][18] Gabbard identifies herself as Vaishnava Hindu[19][20], and often participates in Hindu festivals such as Diwali with Hindu-Americans[21]
"Said to face allegations"
"Allegedly had been alledged"
How is this news
Playing devils advocate: If the UN deploys security forces that will benefit the west who runs the UN. It might result in a similar resolution as what happened to Haiti with the UN keeping a US backed dictator in power.