this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
519 points (96.3% liked)

Greentext

6302 readers
2776 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 166 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This perfectly encapsulates how anti vaxxers and others think. "Ive thought it through and it cantnbebright". Its incredible how we can have access to vast amounts of information and yet live in an age of gleeful ignorance.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 6 days ago (3 children)

>Town of 100 people
>Everyone has $50
>Everyone stores Money In Town Bank
>Total bank balance of everyone: $5000
>Bank lends $1000 to a farmer to buy new equipment
>Merchant who sold the equipment deposits $1000 into bank.
>There is now $6000 total deposited in the bank
>1000 just came out of thin air
Money is fake and gay

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I remember this classic philosophical quandary of our time, but in a different form.

Classic.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago
  1. A and B add 20 to Box. Both have -20 balance.
  2. A sells Box to B for 30. A has 10 balance and B has -50.
  3. A walks away with 10 Profit
  4. B takes cash out of box (40). Made 10 Loss.
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

debt: am I am joke to you?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Be human.

Have billions of tons of atmosphere directly above you

Don't explode

Make it make sense

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This person's grasp of physics is like halfway there. Like one more module and they'd calm the fuck down.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

‘flying for no reason’

‘ignoring gravity’

‘somehow joints don’t break’

Halfway might be overstating it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Nono they're right about basically all but the no reason and ignoring gravity part. The fact that we can design an airframe that stays together under those kinds of forces is indeed absolutely crazy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

"A little knowledge" has never been more dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago

Anon, it took one hundred years of trial and errors in design and mechanical failures, resulting in hundreds of deaths, to perfect the dark arts of aviation.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 days ago

Wokeness is what keeps them in the air, which is why they're falling out of it now

[–] [email protected] 101 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Also weird how giant steel tankers float on the ocean. Especially when they're weighed down by all that cargo. It's practically unbelievable. I throw a tiny rock in the ocean, and it sinks...but not those giant steel boats? /s

[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 days ago (2 children)

No, ocean water can't sink steel boats

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's a well known fact that steel weighs the same as feathers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

A common misunderstanding. Boats (made of rock) float due to gravity pushing the water up (as it bounces off the earth). Boats made of feathers (ducks) harness the same principle, as they are also filled with water.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Well... When you put one of those huge tankers in the water, it will move a LOT of water out of the way.

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

As you keep loading up the tanker with more cargo, it will go deeper into the water right? But this means that it is pushing more water out of the way (the water that used to be where the boat now is), which balances out the weight because that creates more buoyancy.

A rock, on the other hand, is heavier than the water that it displaces, so it sinks like a tanker whose front fell off.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

But steel is heavier than water

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 days ago (6 children)

If you take 1kg of steel and 1kg of water, which is heavier? That's right, steel is heavier.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (10 children)

It's not pressure under the wings, it's fucking Bernoulli sucking on top of them.

(So, yes, sure, it is gay, but it's not fake.)

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When you nut, but Bernoulli keep sucking...

"goofy plane"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

I'm 100% convinced this was never a battle of airframes and manufacturers and simply was down to: "No, sir/ma'am, I will not fly the derpy plane into combat. Can't do it. YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE REST OF THE PILOTS WILL LAUGH AT ME"

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I think large planes "look" like they can't work because their "relative speed" is really low


that is, their speed relative to their length. We're used to seeing birds cover tens of lengths per second, whereas a large airliner covers ~1ish per second at takeoff.

Or not, but this always seemed like a plausible explanation as to why planes look impossible. (Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...).

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago

That's a really thoughtful take, I'm glad you shared. I think it has merit. I think proximity is a factor too. The public rarely gets up close to a jet, but I can attest from personal experience they seem much faster when you're closer during takeoff and landing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...

Birds flying against the wind and staying in the same spot as a result do look kinda weird though. Especially if you are not aware/don't notice there is strong winds

[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 days ago

i remember when i thought these jokes were funny. now i know tons of people actually think like this and it's depressing rather than funny.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The funniest thing is that the aerospace engineers who made this possible are just as much hopeless dysfunctional wrecks as the rest of us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Glue, is how the wings stay on, really good glue

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago (3 children)

hot glue or super glue? I mean super glue has super in the name

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Welding is just extreme hot glue, the hottest glue

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (4 children)

You will trigger a lot of people if you say that welding is gluing

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Well I must admit, when the plane is resting on the ground, the wings droop down a lot. Then when airborne it's the other way around, the wings curve upwards as the fuselage hangs from them. In my mind nothing that big made of metal should be able to flex that much.

But since I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I have learned about material science, airplane design and engineering. And I have found out that it does indeed flex that much. It also isn't that thick, since it's only a skeleton wrapped with a very thin layer of metal. In fact if it didn't flex as much, it would be weaker and not stronger.

So the thing I really learnt is never to trust intuition when it comes to things like this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My faith in humanity is so low that I 100% believe there are planes are not real truthers that's out there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, I mean, those flat earth idiots clearly have never flown, so I wouldn't be surprised if their digging down attitude would include planes. They already think the moon landing is fake, don't they?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Actually that's something I don't understand, they think the moon is a sphere about 100 miles across about 1000 miles above the flat Earth. Why couldn't humans have flown that short distance?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

it depends on your flavor of flat-earther. for the religious types, the firmament is supposed to be in the way. for secular flat-earthers, I think they just like being contrary?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Next time you see a plane imaging two hooks in the middle of the wings, a crane lifting up the plane with these two hooks and shaking it.

This give you a good approximation of what the forces in the plane are, and once you picture that you might think that there is no way the plane can hold up in this situation. Yet it does.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I remember a quote from an A380 pilot saying the plane doesn't look like it should be able to fly.

Even the people that fly them know they don't look like a flying object.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

I get it. That plane is so disgusting the earth tries to keep it as far as possible from the ground.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait till this guy find out that there are more planes in the ocean than there are submarines in the sky

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, technically pregnant women can be submarines

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've read your comment and I'd like you to know that I don't approve of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

Don't forget about the screens they put in the windows

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

...fake and gay

Hey now. Let's not blame gay people for the common-sense-defying demon-wizard sorcery that engineers get up to when someone threatens to take away their calculators and caffeine.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago

Bruh some of the earliest planes were literally called biplanes. The gay has been complicit in aviation demon magic since the very beginning.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›