this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
521 points (96.3% liked)

Greentext

6312 readers
1476 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Also weird how giant steel tankers float on the ocean. Especially when they're weighed down by all that cargo. It's practically unbelievable. I throw a tiny rock in the ocean, and it sinks...but not those giant steel boats? /s

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, ocean water can't sink steel boats

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's a well known fact that steel weighs the same as feathers

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

A common misunderstanding. Boats (made of rock) float due to gravity pushing the water up (as it bounces off the earth). Boats made of feathers (ducks) harness the same principle, as they are also filled with water.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Regardless of how it happened, (the plane hijackings Orchestrated by "ex" CIA operative Osama Bin Laden duh) 9-11 was used as an excuse to dissolve civil liberties at home and wage war abroad.

Patriot Act

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Well... When you put one of those huge tankers in the water, it will move a LOT of water out of the way.

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

As you keep loading up the tanker with more cargo, it will go deeper into the water right? But this means that it is pushing more water out of the way (the water that used to be where the boat now is), which balances out the weight because that creates more buoyancy.

A rock, on the other hand, is heavier than the water that it displaces, so it sinks like a tanker whose front fell off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

But that's only because of the spell that the ancient Wizard Archimedes cast in the elder days. Archimedes didn't discover his principle, he molded reality to follow his rule.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

But steel is heavier than water

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

And water is surprisingly heavy itself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Ah, but boats aren't solid steel! It has lots of hollow spaces inside, making the volume up displaced water bigger, without increasing the weight!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If you take 1kg of steel and 1kg of water, which is heavier? That's right, steel is heavier.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

A steelogram of kilo is feather than heaviers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Now this guy knows what he's talking about

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If she weighs more than a duck, then she’s made of wood.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

And therefore?

... A WITCH!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

We shall use the larger scales!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Since we are pedantic, what you say isn't true.

The tanker weights exactly as much as the weight of the water that it displaces. They are in balance. You describe it yourself. The tanker sinks deeper if it becomes heavier and swims more up as it becomes lighter.

The measure of "boat swims" is not the weight of the displaced water. It is wether there is some boat wall left sticking out of the water to keep more water from entering and displacing the air that keeps the submerged volume in weight balance with the water.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Since we're being extra pedantic, what I said was:

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

This is factually true, and you didn't disprove it.

As for "boat wall sticking out of the water", that's just grasping at straws man. If that boat is fully waterproof, like a submarine, the definition holds up. Or if you consider that water entering the boat adds to the boat weight, then again it will hold true as it will weigh more than the water it displaces.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So we have rising sea levels because there's so many big ships in the ocean, got it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Metal is heavier than water. Virtually every containber is fille to the brim with products, now I don't know you but most everything we buy is heavier than water.

It's clear they have some kind of extra propulsion in those, most likely magnetic anti gravitation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The bane of shipping is that a lot of money goes to shipping air around :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Nah, man...it's magic! Magic is the only explanation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Giant steel ship can transport the giant rock across the sea