this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
267 points (97.2% liked)

Fuck AI

1180 readers
166 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

You should never support the scumbags at Hasbro/WOTC if you are into tabletop games

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

As one of the people leading the charge against Hasbro's use of AI art in HeroQuest, fuck you. We can tell the difference, the quality is garbage, you're stealing from qualified, skilled, hard-working artists, and we don't give a fuck about the shareholders; so knock it the hell off

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Everyone who is doing it is also fielding immense amounts of complaints from everyone forced to use it, but I guess we ignore those pesky details.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fuck D&D, fuck Hasbro. There's plenty of better alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Shadowdark ftw

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Isn't AI pretty much the opposite of why someone would play a tabletop rpg game?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Maybe, but among the rpgs, the Hasbro one is most LLM-like.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

On one hand, yes, but ever since the earliest of CRPGs, many people have dreamt of a virtual table top game in which literally anything is possible like that of a proper table top.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well to be fair, Hasbro is just a small startup. Of course they need AI to level the playing field with the other mega conglomerate in the board game space.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I'm just really hoping that whatever they intend to use AI for isn't art. Ideally there is enough backlash to this that they backpedal again for a year or so, but failing that, I do not want to see it touch the art at all.

In my opinion, WotC is an art company. I don't really see anything better in 2024 D&D 5e to what is expected in Tales of the Valiant 5e or is in Level up Advanced 5e, or for that matter, any RPG really. The only thing they excel on is the money behind them to have an entirely different relationship with artists. And that's not mentioning Magic the Gathering which needs the art even more.

There aren't that many avenues for AI in D&D. You can't really replace the game design due to the fact that AI can't really problem solve or innovate. It's already likely used internally by the finance departments etc, hell it's built into Microsoft programs, it course it is used. It can't really be sued to make the writing more efficient because the writing of a D&D book is sacred, you can't change the word prone to lying down for readability for example.

So it's likely coming for art or WotC are returning to the idea of AI DMs, which is silly and I have no interest in, and I can't imagine it being anything but a totally adjacent product to D&D.

I can't wait to see what evil and terrible way I'm proved wrong.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Another day, another trend-chasing, creativity-hating corporation doing its thing. I really hope I can eventually get a cool art job despite all of this. Edit: Good thing I'm gonna try good ol' Mathfinder out once I graduate from my DnD 5e training wheels.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 days ago (4 children)

If every company started jumping off a bridge, would you follow? /s

In all honesty, just because other companies are using AI doesn't mean you should. Can't wait for the AI bro bubble to pop and fully deflate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

AI is there to stay. You are living in a fantasy world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

That'll never happen. The promise for profits is too high. They'll just keep massaging it and "improving" it till it's too late.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

But think of the economy and the shareholders. We can not, I repeat; WE CAN NOT let them fail! /s

When do we eat?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Made by Humans

I'm buying that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

A quick reminder that there are other TTRPGs out there beyond D&D. I'm currently running a short campaign with Old School Essentials and it's pretty nice!

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 days ago

What terrible timing. The customers are increasingly suspicious of anything even labeled AI. Investors are pushing this, but even they are starting to get cold feet. It only makes sense if they can sell it, and they increasingly can't sell it.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These are the same geniuses who tanked their big Hollywood movie by changing their game license just before the movie came out, right?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Has a 7.2/10 and 91% Tomato score. Profited over 50 million dollars. Hardly a tank

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's a great movie, the best movie yet to come out under the Dungeons and Dragons name. However:

The film made $93 million domestically, which is not good compared to the $150 million budget. Luckily, its worldwide total was $208.2 million, but with marketing costs, it is likely the film did not break even.

https://movieweb.com/dungeons-and-dragons-sequel-unlikely/

It's often difficult to identify why a film didn't perform well, but fan anger over the licensing changes likely contributed, e.g. see: https://screenrant.com/dungeons-dragons-honor-among-thieves-box-office-bomb-reason/

The movie could have been a huge hit instead of just maybe breaking even. Trying to rip off the core fans right before it came out was a dumb idea.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

fan anger over the licensing changes likely contributed

I know that is the specific reason why I haven't seen it and still intend specifically never to.

(Ok, to be fair I was going to end my Hasbro boycott and see it when they backpedaled and did the dual OGL/Creative Commons thing, but then they pulled the MTG Pinkerton bullshit and that made it clear Hasbro had learned less than nothing from the OGL 1.1 blowback.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Can I just use this opportunity to say that, while I enjoyed the movie, I spent the entire time waiting for the bard to use magic and it never happened? Because that really annoyed me. Don't call yourself a D&D movie and then have a bard that can't do magic. But somehow has a lute made of steel.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I've been boycotting Hasbro since the whole OGL 1.1 fiasco. Fuck 'em.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even after they released the 5e srd under CC BY 4.0?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I was going to end my boycott once they did that.

But like... a week later? (I don't remember the exact amount of time, but I remember it being surprisingly soon on the heels of the OGL 1.1 debacle.) They pulled the whole Pinkertons/MTG bullshit. Had they not done that, I'd have bought more 5e materials, watched the D&D movie, and likely caught up on some Transformers movies by now.

At this point, I don't think much could end my boycott of WotC short of Hasbro selling off WotC and better people being put at the helm of WotC. I don't think much could end my boycott of Hasbro short of a huge shift in upper-level management at Hasbro.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In school they told us not to do drugs even if everyone was doing it...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but drugs are awesome

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Pretty much every kid that did D.A.R.E. when I was in middle school ended up smoking copious amounts of weed at the very least. D.A.R.E. shirts were a hot stoner commodity when I was in high school.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's nothing. Wait until Mattel's AI Talking Barbie tells little kids how to kill their parents...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

It will probably just talk them into having eating disorders

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I actually can't believe CEOs are this stupid. We legitimately live in Idiocracy. Do they actually think pointing to a random part of their business and saying "AI it!" will do anything? They're probably going to use it for customer-facing generative AI or LLMs, which have already been shown to reduce customer enthusiasm! The companies who are going to be mildly successful with this will either put in the effort to find an actually useful use case for it, or will use it internally to remove like 60% of their workforce (most companies are too dumb for this, but the profits would be enormous if they ever figured it out).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who knows how many companies have already done the latter part of your comment. We'd have no idea, we'd just see unemployment numbers rising.

Oh dear...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Hehe, whoops

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What terrible timing. The customers are increasingly suspicious of anything even labeled AI. Investors are pushing this, but even they are starting to get cold feet. It only makes sense if they can sell it, and they increasingly can't sell it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean... if everyone else is doing it, then market yourself as the only one NOT doing it. Making sure you are doing the same as everyone else doesn't sound like a recipe for success in their business.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

It's PR speak for "We promised our shareholders layoffs for more profit".

load more comments
view more: next ›