Professorozone

I think most elections would have been as if a Kamala Harris ran against another Kamala Harris. In other words, two normal politicians so that the result wasn't perceived as much of a difference who one. Also, in the past if a politician said things like, "you won't have to vote again" or called the opponent names, he would have been shredded in the media and probably lost the election due to scandal. I mean a felon has never run for president before. Trump just somehow has different rules.

Yeah, they liked being in the middle of a poorly handled pandemic. It was great!!

No.

My problem is that most movies I like were never universally panned, they were just sort of so so. Movies like Fandango. I really liked it but I think it got like a 5.5 on IMDB.

Like most, I totally disagree. However, it had such great potential.

I feel the same about Valerian. The imagery was pure eye candy and then I watched it, so looking forward to a great flick, and what I got was... Valerian.

Yeah, but we would get to say we had a female president.

This is absolutely brilliant.

Yes but he had a very nice office desk I'm told... So there's that.

Yup should be fine without a few of these pesky news agencies around anymore or a few of his political rivals or you know, NOAA and a department of education. I'm sure it will be fine and 50,000 government employees won't be replaced by loyalists. Corporations aren't really paying taxes now anyway, why would a little less matter. Removing protections for minorities won't make a difference either or getting out of NATO. And what a relief not to have to vote anymore. Cozying up to every dictator in the world and paying 10% more for everything will be just like any other election.

I think we're good. Easy Street baby!

Well this didn't age well.

Pretty sure Trump said we wouldn't have to worry about voting anymore. It would all be taken care of.

Did you use the calories or the grams of sugar to determine the amount?