this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
910 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

5401 readers
4041 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

could she, with the scrotus ruled immunity, void the election and have trump and his team arrested for treason?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 39 minutes ago (2 children)

yes, she could.

but so could Biden.

he would be the better choice though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 minutes ago

Do it, and then step down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 31 minutes ago

be more of a dig on the orange shitstain if she did it though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 34 minutes ago

I think that would be hilarious

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

So do her like Kim Campbell? I love the burn to MAGA but she deserves better than that. The first woman president of the US deserves better than that. Sadly I also agree that while unpurchased merch is possible, its also likely that Trump will just make more money off this.

Re Kim Campbell:

Campbell became the new prime minister in June 1993 after Mulroney resigned in the wake of declining popularity. In the 1993 Canadian federal election in October of that year, the Progressive Conservatives were decimated, losing all but two seats from a previous majority, with Campbell losing her own. Her 132-day premiership is the third-shortest in Canadian history.[a]

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

45 + 47 equals 92. just thought i’d share that math fact if anybody was interested

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

Fun fact, n + (n+2) = 2n + 2

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

So smart, much wise.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

This is absolutely brilliant.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I love the idea but hate the thought they would just reprint and make more money.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, but we would get to say we had a female president.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Biden should do an "official act", then resign immediately afterwards.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (4 children)

Like expanding the Supreme Court

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 hours ago

Expand the Supreme Court to 200 people, appoint the most progressive persons out there. Federally legalize marijuana and drop all restrictions on it. Forgive all student and medical debt. Raise the federal minimum wage to $30/hr. Tax all rental income at 4,000%.

Sure it would probably all get undone before the Toupee hit 100 days in office, but what a sweet couple months that would be.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I was thinking long range lobotomy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

My 85 year old German mother-in-law (born in 1939 and moved to Canada around 1960), suggested the same thing.

(PS I'm an American living in Canada)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

During his first term at the gym this little old lady was working out on the treadmill next to me and when Kelly Ann Conway came on the tv, she leans over and goes, oh that lady shouldn't be alive. (paraphrasing to not get banned)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

are you enjoying your healthcare?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Canadian here, the health care is useable. It keeps being underfunded atleast here in Ontario but you can get it with no cost... just be prepared to wait in ER.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

I already wait in the ER for hours, then have the privilege of paying out the ass for it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

If you can wait in an ER there are people that have it worse.. proper distributed healthcare outside hospitals would dramatically reduce this issue, GPs handle so much that the US handles through emergency rooms.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago

And removing the "presidential power to pardon".

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 hours ago

Ah yes, yes...that's exactly what I meant.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's honestly the least he could do. Sure he was a good president with good policies but keeping your head down and fixing things that the GOP are only going to claim credit for isn't helpful at the moment. The DNC has managed to turn decades of good will and evaporate it into nothing. So yes, giving us this small inconsequential win would not be too big of an ask.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

First women president as an asterix is just sad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Sadly its also how Canada got it's first and only woman prime minister.

Campbell became the new prime minister in June 1993 after Mulroney resigned in the wake of declining popularity. In the 1993 Canadian federal election in October of that year, the Progressive Conservatives were decimated, losing all but two seats from a previous majority, with Campbell losing her own. Her 132-day premiership is the third-shortest in Canadian history.[a]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Campbell

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

fwiw she briefly had presidential powers a couple years ago when Biden was sedated for a medical procedure. Source.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ehhh, "acting president" is not really PRESIDENT president, y'know?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

The funny thing is reading the source article, when Trump had the same procedure, he didn't make Pence the acting president because he didn't trust Pence with presidential powers for even an hour.

[–] [email protected] 266 points 12 hours ago (14 children)

Another wild thought: Biden could test the limits of presidential immunity.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 11 hours ago

Joe Biden should see if squatters rights extend to the White House.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Biden already worked under someone who had no problem killing US civilians Source. That escaped prosecution because it was an official act despite it being a clearly criminal act 18 U.S. Code § 1119

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't Obama also kick out more illegal immigrants than a bunch of presidents before him? Maybe I'm misremembering, but I do remember nobody giving a shit about illegal immigrants being kicked out. Then Trump came and people freaked out, as if it didn't happen under Obama as well.

Shit was weird.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Obama was literally known as deporter-in-chief and he deported more in his in either of his terms than Trump did in his four years Source. But be careful some smart ass is probably gonna start screaming you can’t say both sides, and you’re a foreign asset trying to depress the vote because they can’t be bothered to read.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

From my perspective it was less about the numbers and more about how vocal Trump was about his intentions. Add to that the family separation policy and the STILL MISSING children when he's a known associate of Epstien there was plenty to be upset about.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

So you claim that Trump is objectively worse because he was vocal rather than Obama doing it on a muted basis? Despite Obama doing substantially higher numbers? That is definitely some take on these set of facts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No, I'm saying just looking at the numbers doesn't tell the whole story and intentions also play a large role. Trump wanted to do more than he did but was hindered in many ways. He still did untold damage to our immigration systems and irreparably damaged hundreds of families. It's really difficult to explain a concept as vast as this without essentially writing a book, and that isn't my strong suit.

I'm perfectly okay with Obama also being a bad guy here, but he didn't publicly dehumanize immigrants and their families. He also didn't advocate for removing legal residents based solely on their demographic information.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I hate to use this term but you are literally arguing against facts with only feelings; feelings based on comments that arguably amount to mere puffery. My argument is that there is no good guys here, but it appears you are stuck on the point that Trump was worse for undocumented individuals because of feelings, rather than an actual objective measure like numbers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 38 minutes ago

I can understand why you would think that and I agree that I'm not providing much factual information to work with. I'm not really trying to win an argument here. I was attempting to suggest that relying purely on one data set without considering the wider political and social context is a poor way to form an opinion.

I have a hard time clearly communicating my thoughts and tone via text, but please believe that I mean no disrespect. That being said, bringing up Obama's numbers in a discussion about Trump is quite literally excusing Trump's attempted atrocities because someone else was "worse" in your chosen metric. My position is that numbers don't always tell the whole story.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, I have no clue how you thought this fact was enough to argue against "Trump is objectively worse than Obama".

Trump is by far, and I mean by an unreal margin, the WORST human being to ever hold the seat of President of the United States of America. There is no debate that Trump is objectively the worst.

Now sure some people did some things more than others. That's true for everything. Obama deporting illegal immigrants is nothing like the racism and hatred towards racialized Americans has stoked on the last 8 years. An illegal immigrant KNOWS their number could be up at any time, it's not a hateful act to legally deport them. But now, EVERY minority in the US, and all women, know their number might get called at any time, and that's a fear that no lawful citizen deserves.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago

You expanded the scope of the discussion (that you weren’t involved in at that) just to get yourself upset.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

thanks for sharing that. i was not aware of it. it’s particularly brutal that the link is fact checking ron desantis of all people, but i guess it’s not impossible for a republican to say something true on occasion (even if by accident).

i thought this quote from the link was particularly damning:

But did Trump deport fewer people than Obama? There are different deportation metrics, and Obama surpassed Trump’s numbers in each one.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 hours ago

All that would do is gut new trump merch out into the world, and earn him more money. How would this be good?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 hours ago

I was thinking this too. Except he should do it right before Thanksgiving, so Kamala’s fist job as president is pardon the turkeys.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 hours ago

Oh no, those poor wealthy maga merch company owners would have to print something new knowing their cult would feel obligated to buy it?

Funny in theory but it'd just enrich the grifters. Yeah, the cult members deserve it...but I can't get behind furthering the wealth divide

load more comments
view more: next ›