Edit: As of five minutes ago, I am aware that there is no official ui for the elgato stream deck which is a huge disservice to the users of this expensive piece of hardware. I was under the impression that streamdeck-ui was the official (and very outdated) official version, which is false. Those who bothered to explain this, thank you very much. To those piling up on someone who just hasn't as much knowledge as you do: feels bad man. Maybe consider that this is not reddit and schooling someone does not have to be aggressive.
Hi folks!
I have switched to my Linux daily driver this week and after some starting issues, it's working quite well.
But a few bits and bobs are quite annoying, such as streamdeck ui. The windows version looks and feels like a spaceship compared to the barebones version I have on ubuntu 23.04
Here's what the windows version looks like.
Additionally, the windows version has plugins and stuff that pretty much make giant scripts that can do pretty much anything and everything. The Linux version doesn't even have it's own pictures that come with it.
If you're curious I just used apt install streamdeck-ui instead of the complex stuff that is on the web (and doesn't work anymore because outdated).
Am I just using a really outdated version or is the linux version just trash?
TL;DR: Linux version of streamdeck ui looks 20 yrs old while the windows version looks like photoshop.
Thanks for reading. Have a good one!
Thanks for making your opinion abundandly clear. That acutally helped a great deal. :)
I, sadly have the same nvidia problem. Good example btw how hard it is to find good information about linux stuff. I read a lot of posts on nvidia vs amd and most were like "it doesn't really matter but amd is more cooperative". Thats the issue. I would argue that someone who is making a linux build should absolutely stay away from nvidia but people are not as clear.
And thanks too for the suggestion. i will definitely write an email to elgato voicing my frustration.
Meta: May I ask something else? Why is it that linux centric subs often get called out for being condescending, dogpiling and gatekeeping? My case is a great example. I voiced frustration while apparently being ignorant. Instead of just telling me "take that up with elgato" people got offended (i assume) and downvoted and outright piled up on me. That is the exact opposite of welcoming new posters. I happen to moderate c/ubuntuserver and r/ubuntuserver where I delete comments dogpiling on ignorant people all the time and even get modmail asking why I allow ignorant people to ask questions in a support community. I don't get it. Can't we just try and answer peoples questions?
Sorry, lengthy answer because difficult question.
How I stop worrying about Nvidia and deal with it
I have voiced my frustration with Nvidia elsewhere, and there are still annoying bugs, that no one can fix because it's proprietary, but I live through it because I love everything else on Linux.
I like that using Linux makes me more careful, I learn things all the time, I stopped feeling entitled to many things. The idea of a software is changed dramatically, it's a code as an MVP, then built up slowly based on what the dev wants, as they often use the projects they maintain themselves, or contribution and requests from their users, which is so much more sustainable than what you get in the for-profit, proprietary domain.
For this reason, I avoid negatively talking about small community-driven foss projects on the internet, because I can be actively constructive by being the change I want to see, whereas on Windows I would be stuck with a subpar product with no source code to investigate.
I think in your case, and please don't take it personal, we don't know each other, I don't know what you're going through or how you are as a person, I'm making a small judgement based on word choice here, but calling something "trash", even after you know it's made by someone who probably wants to use their streamdeck on Linux (just like you) is quite a hostile thing to say and will invite some hostility back. I would retract it but you do you.
Caveat Now, some foss devs are whirling shit against each other all the time on their personal blogs but that's within their own dev-dev domain, not user-dev domain. Say hypothetically if you start contributing to streamdeck-ui and the Dev starts being an AH then you can fork it and maybe then go online and vent.
Why forums appear toxic
I can admit some forums read very blunt and impatient, like BBS Arch Forum, but they only exercise patience when it's a big they've never seen before, and will ask you to paste all sorts of command outputs to troubleshoot, otherwise, they are quick to recognise if the problem have been encountered, and will typically send you to the link of the solved post or tell you to RTFM because it's somewhere in the manual. To be frank, this behavior I can understand and have no issue with.
On more general forums like this one, it's often the case users ask question that they can do some precursor research and once stuck (no mention of issues anywhere, no similar thread), then if they do post, I've only seen poor quality comments like "works for me" or "same but idk the fix", since the commenters will have to do the same searches the poster did and come to the same conclusions (here, it's nice to send them links you researched to save them a few clicks). I've made similar posts with great details on what I tried but it's still broken. If no one knows, then I open an issue.
Now, if they didn't do research beforehand, commenters will look it up and then have to correct you but they might feel annoyed because why didn't you do it before posting. Not everyone will be bothered by it. But I do feel like a search or two beforehand will bring a much more fruitful discussions.
I won't defend inflammatory toxic language, but I don't think there are any here present in this thread, it's just a lot of "AcKtuaLLy" comments, but those were done to correct you and if I were you I don't think I wouldn't really get all defensive. I pride my time using Linux, and other commenters probably do too, but we all started somewhere so we know when we see the "I didn't do my research but gonna post anyway" attitude. If one likes doing this, just get ready for people who want to correct things, I guess.
It's a kind of tough love here where it's heavily encouraged that one does their own heavy lifting instead of relying on others. At least that's what I've observed. It might be negative, but it's better being spoonfed. I've managed to avoid such negativity by trying to exhaust all options before posting for help. I learned so much and I hope you find a way to approach Linux that works for you! There are still others out there who aren't jaded by newbie questions and still will help, just don't expect their language to be nurturing.
Also, please consider ignoring internet points, they do nothing but makes you feel distressed. In places like this it's a bit like on Hacker News where it's to show if a comment is helpful/ constructive, or not. It's not personal.
I read through your answer completely. Thank you. It’s actually (again) mostly the same thinking process I have and my ideas are mostly the same.
That I am trying to say is that the reaction „post all logs and outcomes of these commands“ is exactly how I like it. Classic troubleshooting. Professional, just great.
What I take issue with is assuming to know why a person said something. I asked if the product I wrongly assumed is for profit made is just trash or if I got it wrong. The exact wording is different but the context of both my post and comments clearly shows that I am not assuming I know everything. Thats why I asked.
It’s a misunderstanding, I get it but it shows me that you actually shouldn’t ask here since you need to obey to an arbitrary rule of law which is completely different from any nettiquette.
And lastly, as you said, internet points show if a comment is helpful. My post and comments were helpful both in describing the problem and explaining how I drew the conclusion.
I‘m not taking this personal, I‘m trying to show that shitting on people, however wrong or stupid they may seem, is our problem everywhere. It’s actually why people get redicalized irl. Because they are misunderstood and then reigned in by bad actors.
So my conclusion is: be careful who you (as in everyone) shit on because you’re actively making the world a worse place. One post/comment at a time. It’s fun for you and your superior buddies, but not for the other one. That makes you bullies, nothing else.