this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
521 points (96.3% liked)

Greentext

6312 readers
1402 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Be human.

Have billions of tons of atmosphere directly above you

Don't explode

Make it make sense

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This person's grasp of physics is like halfway there. Like one more module and they'd calm the fuck down.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

‘flying for no reason’

‘ignoring gravity’

‘somehow joints don’t break’

Halfway might be overstating it

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nono they're right about basically all but the no reason and ignoring gravity part. The fact that we can design an airframe that stays together under those kinds of forces is indeed absolutely crazy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Crazy, but not fake (or gay lol) 😉

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Sorry. It's real but gay. Nothing as phallic as an airliner can be straight.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Not fake or gay? Sounds fake and gay

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

"A little knowledge" has never been more dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago

Wokeness is what keeps them in the air, which is why they're falling out of it now

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago

Anon, it took one hundred years of trial and errors in design and mechanical failures, resulting in hundreds of deaths, to perfect the dark arts of aviation.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think large planes "look" like they can't work because their "relative speed" is really low


that is, their speed relative to their length. We're used to seeing birds cover tens of lengths per second, whereas a large airliner covers ~1ish per second at takeoff.

Or not, but this always seemed like a plausible explanation as to why planes look impossible. (Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...).

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago

That's a really thoughtful take, I'm glad you shared. I think it has merit. I think proximity is a factor too. The public rarely gets up close to a jet, but I can attest from personal experience they seem much faster when you're closer during takeoff and landing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...

Birds flying against the wind and staying in the same spot as a result do look kinda weird though. Especially if you are not aware/don't notice there is strong winds

[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 days ago

i remember when i thought these jokes were funny. now i know tons of people actually think like this and it's depressing rather than funny.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My faith in humanity is so low that I 100% believe there are planes are not real truthers that's out there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, I mean, those flat earth idiots clearly have never flown, so I wouldn't be surprised if their digging down attitude would include planes. They already think the moon landing is fake, don't they?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Actually that's something I don't understand, they think the moon is a sphere about 100 miles across about 1000 miles above the flat Earth. Why couldn't humans have flown that short distance?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

it depends on your flavor of flat-earther. for the religious types, the firmament is supposed to be in the way. for secular flat-earthers, I think they just like being contrary?

load more comments
view more: next ›