Not on this political climate.
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
310 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
66353 readers
5284 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Came here to say something like this. Its clear that we will not get anything that benefits the real citizens.
Good thing the end of Windows support isn't the end of the story for PC at least.
Is it year of the Linux desktop yet?
It's always been the year of the Linux desktop. tvwm made for a fine desktop.
When was the last time you used a desktop?
For most people, their smartphone is their computer, and (globally) Android is the top used one. Android is a version of Linux, so every year for quite a while has been the Year of the Linux "desktop".
I use a desktop all day, every day (Arch, btw) because I work a tech job.
Android is based on Linux, true but it is hardly a desktop environment (and is mostly controlled by the carrier/Google from a privacy/enshittification perspective).
I think the Steamdeck is a better example. It's converting console gamers into Linux desktop users and showing people that Linux gaming is very much possible.
I've learned from my mistakes with Google IoT. Unless I can host things myself, preferably even before the product inevitably dies, i'm not even considering it
How about getting forced to go open source when they abandon a product?
The problem is that many companies can't do that as they can't give you their custom server code. The only solution here would be to change design from the beginning so that devices can work without servers and are also so secure that they don't need security updates
That is the point: The pure threat of being forced to open that code could shift the business model to not have proprietary server / cloud code at all.
Too risky. Who knows what's hiding in their code. Might be some copylefted library or a piece of code that's been copy-pasted into the project without fully complying with the copyleft requirements. Making sure this isn't the case and/or cleaning up an abandoned project can be costly and complicated. Easier for them to just kill it.
Are you describing WinAmp ?
I love the distaste for the word that is opposite of left/the side of the political spectrum where fascism resides
There is actualy a definition for the term "copyleft".
No they dont, not with the current american administration.
Whoever pays the most money makes the rules. I mean, it was always like that but they don't have to hide it nearly as much.
They convinced a good chunk of the country that it’s a good thing.
The best weapon we have against these parasites of open source and self hosting.
Don't feed your enemy with funds.
Deny the parasite profit and engagement
Most IoT devices that died did so because the vendor went out of business and had to shut off the servers. Most lived in hope that a last minute investment would keep them afloat. In a few other cases, it was the middleware software provider (like Google IoT) that shut down and bricked a device.
This legislation might apply to a big company that decides to discontinue a product line and could then send notices out, but most startups won't know (or admit defeat) till the last possible moment. By then it's too late.