this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
1017 points (98.5% liked)

News

25665 readers
3633 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I too wish to own republican women again. Hell I'll work hard so I can afford whole binders full of women.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 228 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)

I'm not sure if the article covers it, still reading, but one of the things they want to do to disenfranchise transfoks is to require the the name on your birth certificate matches you're legal name in order to vote.

As most married women don't change their name on their birth certificate when they take their husbands last name, they would not be able to vote either.

Edit: The article does go into all of this.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Interesting thing about that is that, while it's still common practice, a lot of more left-leaning women did away with taking their husband's name years ago

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah my wife and I just kept our name. Its funny because over the years we sorta wish we would have done the traditional thing as it would make a variety of things easier but now apparently its becoming a brilliant move.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My wife did the same, but for unofficial stuff, she uses my last name as hers.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

yeah its more problematic for official stuff really. like being in the hospital. Its not much but like you tend to have to make it more clear your the spouse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Left leaning women are also far less likely to get married to begin with.

The article actually points all of that out, it will be Republican women who mostly are disenfranchised by this.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In a sort of twisted way that could result in a blue wave if they disenfranchised ~half of their own voters and not the left.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

They’ll presumably remedy this by giving husbands extra votes on behalf of their wives and children, as in Franco-era Spain.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Holy. Fucking. Shit. That’s bad. That’s oppressively stupid fucking bad.

Hey Americans: Don’t want to be oppressed or live in a fascist state? Immigrate to Canada! We’re hella friendly and open to people’s of all kinds, except MAGAs and Nazis and or maga-nazis

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If only it was that easy...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

I mean, y'all gonna let me in? I need a place to crash for at least 4 years.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 123 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Remember the MAGA women wearing the "You Can Grab My Pussy" shirts? Not all Republican women are going to be upset by this.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had to look that up to see if it was real, and sure enough—but I honestly shouldn’t be surprised. Utterly fucking revolting. On the other hand, the tee website display of a black man wearing it while saluting is pretty hilarious

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

As a fairly jacked middle aged bald man, I want to get one for the funny, but I won't give them money.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This isn't a leaopards eating faces thing for republican women. These women derive social, economic, and political benefits through their association with the men who hold power in our patriarchal system. By aligning with backwards gender roles or evil ideologies, they feel protected and valued within the system even as it restricts their autonomy. They know what they're doing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They just want to sit at home during the day taking queludes and fucking the mailman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (10 children)

They do, but there is an assumption that the relationship between women like that and the wealthy ruling class men they attach themselves to is reciprocal. It, of course, is not.

Take the woman who has a child by Elon Musk. Her and Musk had a romantic getaway and brief liason. She clearly wasn't upset at being pregnant by him. There was an assumption that she'd be cared for. Even if not directly, indirectly. She definitely did not anticipate that she would actually be confined to an apartment 24 hours a day, entirely neglected without any contact from the father of her child. Nor that she'd be left with a child to raise on her own, and no support either financial or emotional or in terms of literal labor.

Call her ignorant and bigoted, both are valid criticisms. But she absolutely was not anticipating this outcome. There is a presumption from conservative/fascist women that they occupy a position of hierarchy over non-fascist/non-conservative women. That by virtue of supporting fascism and patriarchy that fascist men will afford them personhood. They don't believe in any of the assertions of feminism. They instead believe that women who suffer at the hands of men simply deserve it. That all women are judged in some kind of meritocracy, where belief in fascism and support of fascists itself is a determining factor of merit.

They are infuriatingly wrong. But do not be so quick to mischaracterize all conservative/fascist women as knowingly participating in the elimination of their own rights. They are systematically indoctrinated. Inexcusably, I will add. There is no justification for supporting fascists, no justification for supporting violence against women. To combat the ideology they espouse it is crucial to understand not just what they say but what they think.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Tis is gonna be one of the most delicious schadenfraude of all. They think they are safe, but soon enough they are going to discover how important is being a white straight able-bodied male for these fascists. And how unimportant they are outside of a bedroom or a kitchen.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're overestimating Republican women...

Ever hear one of those stories about a Military wife who believes Rank is sexual transmitted so she has all the authority of her husband?

That's how they think.

It's not that all women are lower than all men, it's that the wife has the defacto "rank" as the their husband.

Disclaimer:

Obviously I'm not saying I agree with it, but that's how they think and why they're ok with this.

You have to think like them, they're "property" so treating a man's wife badly is like going up and pissing on his giant truck, the man will "handle" the offense. And the only way for a woman to gain social ranking is marrying a "powerful" man.

A frightening amount of woman think that's a good system.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've seen examples of this in real life. It is WEIRD

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Bruh...

The county I grew up in voted 95% plus trump in the last three elections.

It was weird to run into anyone who didn't think like that till I was over 18 and in college. Even then at a red state college, lots of women viewed themselves as status symbols. Their self worth was solely determined by the "best" guy that would date them.

Like, for large parts of America that's still the norm. And no amount of "Yaaaas Queen" social media posts will change their thinking. It's not even that they're trapped and need saved, that's the life they choose a lot of the time, you don't have to grow up in it.

But everyone still acted shocked women were voting for trump.

If we dont understand why they're doing it, we'll never change their minds.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago

I will not enjoy seeing all American women being marginalised. I will, however, enjoy seeing Americans finally exercising their right to protest a fascist government.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

If you think the average guy is going to be treated any better I've got a bridge to sell you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is almost like MAGA is sexist.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

They seem to like terrible isms.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wish it was only republican women losing their rights.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

How ironic, that dehumanizing rhetoric is exactly how we got here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago

Oh wow who could have predicted this

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago

I've fought tooth and nail against accepting this, but looking at their plans it's becoming unavoidable: This will not end without violence.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Face eating leopards are going to be morbidly obese by the end of this administration.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They needed conservative women to vote this felon. And now they don't need them because he plans to stay forever. This will happen with everyone that supported him. He has disdain for everyone except himself. He will turn on everyone. His ego is massive and he is power trippin' right now. I can't wait until he tries to fire the Supreme Court and not replace anyone. Trump Jong Un coming soon. When they complete a border wall with Canada, we are locked in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When are they going to start coming for the black folks so we can watch Clarence Thomas squirm?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Maybe he'll get fired for being a DEI justice. I honestly don't want whatever would replace him tho.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not from the US: What happened to Katie Britt, who gave her response to Biden's State of the Union address from her kitchen? Is she happy now? I mean, not that I wanted to criticize anyone, but that was totally obvious even before the election.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I mean, a major problem in society is that two incomes are required to pay off a mortgage - and making one member of that equation unable to work society wide would solve that, leading to mortgages and hence housing price calibration (calibrating it to a single wage income)....

...but I was kind of hoping that wouldn't be a product of gender segregation. Also this seems like it's going to affect a lot of other things and people women's autonomy and hence freedom and safety in jeopardy.

No Bueno.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it’s adorable that people believe that the capitalists would do away with female labor instead of going back to the good old days of just devaluing it. The myth that women didn’t work outside the home is a fiction. Only the upper classes could afford such a luxury. Poor woman always had to work, often for much less pay.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›