this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
603 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

62073 readers
4685 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It isn’t racist enough, so he has to take over and train it on nazi propaganda.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 hour ago

This is corporate trolling. Open AI is trying to go public soon, and Elon did this to fuck with that.

Massive oversimplification but basically: In the United States, you are required to take the best offer when selling a company, unless you can argue in court that you had reasons not to sell to whomever placed the highest bid. Because of this offer, as open AI attempts to go public, they will have to either to be close to Elon's bid, forced to sell to him, go to court and fight him ther, or be forced to remain private.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

He bought Twitter for 44 billion... and the US presidency for 290 million.

That is the single most dystopian shit I have ever heard. The idea that people and countries are so dirt cheap and companies are orders of magnitude more valuable is a thing that should damn their souls to hell.

You how bad this is affecting me? I've been an atheist and anti-death penality most of my life... Musk has for the past while made me think that the death penalty needs to be applied to people like him (and Israeli war criminals) and not to common crooks and common murderers. He is even making me want a hell to exist so people like him can burn in it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

and the US presidency for 290 million.

So, about a dollar per American.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Everyone should've chipped in with a dollar and you'd have your own country! /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

But that's socialism.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 23 hours ago

He can afford to pay twice the price of Twitter because he's using government money. Remember he barely swung the 44 billion for Twitter. Now he's buying something for more than double that? After putting code into the Treasury department computers to hide transactions?

Lmao.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago

He offered to buy it with someone else's money and take the credit

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

even if openai are assholes, chatgpt is still useful for things as long as you dont put too much trust in it. If that fucker buys it they will turn it into racist shitspewing garbage. Without it, regular people will have no decent or easy way to utilize ai and this new tech will benefit only the rich who will use it to oppress us even worse.

Stinky isnt an idiot, i wish he was. Anything he buys he can and will use to cause harm to us. So this would be bad for us all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Regular users can use Gemini, Deepseek, Meta AI, and there will probably be many more services in the future.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago

Deepseek took the training of foundation models from a billionaire's game to a millionaire's game. If Elon wants an AI monopoly, it'll have to be done through litigation. Which, ya know, they're also trying.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 23 hours ago

How to become a millionaire: Start with 97.4 Billion.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

YES!

Finally a way to destroy the AI hype.

Maybe the man is good for something besides wasting oxygen after all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Is he going to buy a “founder” clause in the contract?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Well this time he actually is one of the founders. He invested 45 million to launch OpenAI and he was co-chair with Altman

https://www.forbes.com/sites/theopriestley/2015/12/11/elon-musk-and-peter-thiel-launch-openai-a-non-profit-artificial-intelligence-research-company/

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Elon’s $97.4B hostile takeover bid for OpenAI is less about “safety” and more about a billionaire’s corporate tantrum. The offer reeks of desperation—a laughable lowball for a company valued at $340B, dressed as altruism.

Altman’s clapback—“buy Twitter for $9.74B”—is the perfect middle finger to Musk’s flailing empire. Remember when X became a $44B dumpster fire? Now he wants to drag OpenAI into his orbit of mismanaged toys.

This feud isn’t about AI ethics—it’s two tech oligarchs weaponizing legal battles and PR stunts. Musk’s “open-source” crusade is safety theater while his own xAI hoards code. The only winner here? Lawyers billing hourly as the world burns.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To be clear (and as far as I understand), it’s not a hostile takeover bid because it cannot be: OpenAI is not a public company and thus doesn’t have a fiduciary duty to thousands to millions of shareholders but instead to a handful of big investors who can decide for themselves whether they want that Elon’s money or not. So this isn’t similar to what Twitter had been through but more like Elon teasing Altman I believe.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The distinction you’re making is valid but misses the forest for the trees. Whether OpenAI is public or not, Musk’s bid is a textbook power play, not a genuine offer. The lack of fiduciary duty doesn’t erase the intent—it amplifies it. This isn’t about shareholder obligations; it’s about Musk leveraging his wealth to reshape AI governance in his image.

Comparing this to Altman’s jab at Twitter isn’t apples-to-apples. Altman’s point was rhetorical, highlighting Musk’s track record of overpromising and underdelivering. The “open-source” crusade Musk touts is hollow when xAI remains proprietary.

This isn’t about legality or structure—it’s about influence and control. Dressing it up as altruism insults anyone paying attention.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Where is the "hide Musk/DOGE/Trump related posts" button ?

EDIT : Found it ! (Damn, Lemmy is awesome 😊)

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Bro, I think you just wiped out your entire front page.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago

In order to ruin it like Twitter?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This kind of thing is why it's short-sighted even for the other tech guys to cozy up to Trump. There's no room for anyone other than Musk and he is just going to use his leverage with Trump to screw over the other billionaires as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 169 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Genius mastermind shadow president plan:

  1. Buy company A for shit ton of money
  2. Ruin company A so it is worth 80% less
  3. Still have shit ton of money
  4. Repeat with company B
[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, looks like buying Twitter was a very effective choice if you take profit off the priority list

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I mean, yeah. That was the entire point of him buying it: to control one of the biggest social media networks ever, and to use that to push and pull the public discourse however he wanted, in the interest of being a kingmaker. And it fucking worked.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Buy a company mostly with other people's money (he paid ~15B of the 44B offer) lose a lot, 70% or more but use it to win an election and gain 200B in profit.

Musk is a salesman and he's good at getting investors to get behind his crap. He's never produced actual value but that doesn't matter to stock values apparently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 35 minutes ago

Tesla investors are starting to care, it seems.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 192 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

not even one-third of the valuation openai thinks they're worth (up to 340b). and still below what investors thought in 2022 (157b). src

i think this is old spice admitting that xAI is total bullshit and he's giving up on making his own.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shortly after the news was announced, Altman posted on X: “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.”

If only their slapfight meant something good for the world. At least, I don't see everything collected in Musk's hands.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

Lmao "Twitter"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

Why buy it now and not earlier?

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Hahah he really hates Altman's guts. Good. Love to see those two expend their energy on each other rather than on fucking all of us.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Unfortunately, they can multitask

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah so he's again going to pay twice the amount of what it's worth to then run of off a cliff and make it worth 20% of it's real value within a years time?

Seriously, why do people still believe anything this scammer says?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“It’s time for OpenAI to return to the open-source, safety-focused force for good it once was,” Musk said in a statement provided by his lawyer Marc Toberoff to The Wall Street Journal. “We will make sure that happens.”

I'll believe that when I see it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›