this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023

364 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32288 readers

823 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

364

US vetoes UN resolution calling for Gaza ceasefire (www.semafor.com)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution Friday calling for a ceasefire to the fighting in Gaza.

The U.S. and Israel have opposed calls for a ceasefire, saying it would strengthen Hamas.

The vote was delayed for several hours over worries the U.S. would veto it. Diplomats from several Arab nations met with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to try to convince the U.S. to abstain from voting.

As a permanent member of the council, the U.S. has veto power, and had signaled it planned to block the resolution. The U.K. abstained from the vote, while the 13 other members of the council voted for it.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 122 points 10 months ago (4 children)

15 countries voting, they lost 13-1 (UK abstained), literally only the US voted against the resolution and yet they can veto it.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 10 months ago (6 children)

It is clearly US and UK vs Gaza children.

"Oh hamas did this and that so lets kill them all, stop water food and aid and move 2 million around" is not justified ...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This was always the plan.

People are wising up but I doubt anything can stop it now.

Cat is out of the bag.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does a "no" vote by the US automatically veto it? Or did they have to take an additional action? If the vote alone didn't veto it, that's the perfect place to hedge your bets. Vote no, then don't veto it. You can claim both sides then to appease everyone.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No by the US (or China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom) means veto.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Well that's dumb. But rules are rules.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

aww shucks we have to allow genocide its the rules

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

It was more meant that they couldn't vote no then not veto. That being the case they should have at least abstained like the UK.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 96 points 10 months ago (1 children)

US refuses to block Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

US actively supports Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 10 months ago (13 children)

I don't expect Joe Biden to act against his interests, but I also can't believe he thinks this is in his interest! Are there that many people in America who think this is the right thing to do? People danced when Henry Kissinger died, who fails to see the legacy of this?

load more comments (13 replies)

[–] [email protected] 51 points 10 months ago (2 children)

These are times when I'm ashamed to be an American.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 10 months ago (1 children)

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

I'm 70 years old. Of course it's not the first time. Cute meme though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nowadays I wonder if you guys have any times you aren't.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago (34 children)

Genocide Joe is insatiable.

load more comments (34 replies)

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago

Trump years aside, I've rarely been so ashamed of my country. And I'm no spring chicken.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago

amerikkka

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago

No one should have veto power, it makes any organization extremely undemocratic. And given the American arsenal, it's already difficult to be democratic.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (7 children)

very good harm reduction from the genocide joe junta

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Every civilian death in Gaza going forward is a direct consequence of US actions. US is directly responsible for facilitating a genocide.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] yolo 25 points 10 months ago

UN is the change.org of the real world. The idea is great but it only works on extremely rare cases. I know its purpose is to stop next world war but it should stop trying to seem like a platform for discussion as there is no discussion to be had when you give someone power to veto any resolution.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

The UN with their permanent members are a disgrace. All they do is uphold imperialism and say please don't do that.

load more comments