rando895

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 53 points 9 months ago

What I find interesting is it seems like we are again converging on the same service as cable. Which suggests that the best method of profiting off watching movies/tv at home is to have ad supported entertainment, with a monthly fee.

Once again, the profit motive ruins something good .

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Maybe, it sounds familiar. But if past trends are any indication, once enough of the market is dominated by EVs, there will be a lot more money to be made by lowering quality to a bare minimum.

And the infrastructure argument still stands in that case.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

They haven't shied away, it is just more profitable to mine outside your borders using slave labour. The fact of it is, with planned obsolescence being the best way to ensure a steady demand of a product, and the environmental destruction required to support the manufacturing and use of EVs, they still are not a solution. They are a market solution which means it is profitable, and a lateral move at best, and a back step at worst.

If EVs help the environment that is secondary.

https://miningwatch.ca/publications/2023/9/6/contemporary-forms-slavery-and-canadian-mining-industry

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

The criticisms are also that companies use slavery to acquire the materials to make EVs. And they don't work well in the cold (see current cold snap in Canada), the lifetime of the batteries aren't great, and we still need to destroy huge swaths of land to create cars, park/store cars, and drive cars.

EVs are only going to save the car industry. To fix it requires a redesign of cities (see Strongtowns, not justbikes, city beautiful, etc.).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

You do what you want, it's your cabin

[–] [email protected] 51 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I prefer to only read the top line of a meme then post. And no that's not a Lemmy user, that's squidward

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I don't think there is any data to back that up.

1st year econ says something supply demand curve something something price. But that's not true in practice

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  1. And you may own one cabin but it must be used by you and cannot be rented out
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Violence is the only option, even if you don't like it. Ask Nelson Mandela.

Alternatively, like in Canada, have your people become the majority and give them Independence, and forget about the destruction of the natives.

Liberation will never be given to you by your oppressor.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Probably important to point this out: private property is not personal property.

E.g. An apartment building rented to tenants is the landlords private property. They have exclusive rights to the decisions, especially economic ones, regarding the building and the profits of the rent.

A car, book, house, pizza, are all your personal property so long as you don't owe a lender anything for them.

So no private property might look like:

The people who live in an apartment building own the building collectively and have the full right therein, but the individual units are each their own personal property.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

A neat thing is no one actually needs to even die to meet the definition of a genocide

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Well, playing the same game as rich guys will result in you losing. But it's important to remember the October revolution was funded with much less.....

view more: next ›