meco03211

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

You would need to know an original outcome of an event to apply the Novikov self-consistency principle. Otherwise how do you know this wasn't always what happened?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

If it starts to make his numbers dip it could trigger them to divert more money to Ohio it hadn't previously meant to. Could have a broader effect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

It's not that they don't have places to go. It's moreso whatever causes them to move likely causes other animals to need to move. It might take a generation or two to settle into a new dynamic between avoiding predators that are also adjusting and finding food and water.

However that doesn't have a major impact on populations. What can have a major impact is being over/under hunted. There needs to be a balance between those extremes. If wolves aren't culled they will hunt the deer population too thin. That heavy predation can lead to population boons of wolves that subsequently suffer due to scarcity of food. This leads to wolves encroaching on human areas and possibly posing a threat. On the other side, if deer have no predators they begin to overpopulate and can also encroach on human areas causing their own issues. With deer, hunting helps keep that population in check. Currently there's nothing keeping the wolf population in check. As others mentioned, the endangered species act was to protect actual endangered species. The goal is to aid the recovery of the population. That's been done. If they continue to receive protection, they'll start causing other problems that will need to be dealt with.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Also his rally crowd sizes are very small. Very.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This made me think of that xkcd with the "hot singles in your area of lower ~~east~~ earth orbit" comic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Add it to the pile.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Beyond that, I'm sure it's embarrassing as hell once they realize they were so thoroughly hoodwinked. No one wants to go back to the groups or boards or forums and say "it didn't work". They're likely to get drowned out by the idiots trying to find any fault in their approach (did you thumbprint in red ink over your wet signature at a 45 angle?).

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You hear about them because it's unusual. Someone shot in the pinky toe and surviving is not newsworthy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 97 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It also beautifully displayed how fragile they are. Just push them a tiny bit and they go apoplectic that you don't just swallow their bullshit like their eager sycophants.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/GMIf8KqOKdA?si=JPoe-NY6LlUqwAgU

Here's another one to add to your watch list.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But she existed menacingly!

 

The cliche understanding is that dogs mark their territory with pee. At times I've been on walks with family and friends with half a dozen dogs. There have been occasions where they form a line just to pee in the same spot.

So how does the ownership work? Is it like a co-op? Last one to pee wins?

view more: next ›