Memes taken down and replies deleted in conversations because they contain copyrighted text and images. Lyrics censored in online conversation. All video containing any image with a logo protected by trademark, or characters protected by international copyright, even when on T shirts and signs being taken down.
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
60 points (98.4% liked)
Ask Lemmy
26275 readers
1656 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
My comment on this thread isn’t visible when J view the thread itself. It’s visible if I access it through my own comment history.
Does anyone know why that might be? I’m using the Voyager client for ios.
Can y’all see a comment I made, top level, in this thread, other than this one?
Parents have to pay a fee for the firstname they give their kids. Popular firstnames cost more, gross ones cost less.
The kids themselves have to pay again for it monthly, their whole live long.
Nah it should be like fetishes, the more obscure the more expensive. But you can get John or Mark for free.
This might be the only valid reason to ever name a kid "Jayrahmyie"
Now everyone is going for this and they're gonna charge more WHAT HAVE YOU DONE
Made themself a mint, that's what.
I actually think this backfires on most of you. Copyright law makes everything public domain after a period of time, Johnny Fires kids will be able to trade for all the first professionals in the world. But Life +70 years after currency is invented, anyone can print cash and trade falls apart and services and materials are the only thing if value. Copyright laws broken :shrug:
LOL copyright law isn't the only law that says you can't print your own money
Damn, if only someone had asked a hypothetical question wherein copyright law controls everything.
Oh well, that'll never happen.
Good thing you were here to rectify such a foolish mistake.
Lineages could claim copyright of children and their works as derivative. Entire families could claim copyright of their descendants and all works related. Each new generation resets the timer on expiration if the copyright expirations still apply.
Royalties every time you use a line from a Disney musical in spoken conversation
Don't give them any ideas
Rest assured that they've already had that idea a dozen times already, and if they thought they could make it stick, they would have done so by now.
Paying money every time you sit on a chair. Part goes to the owner, part goes to taxes, part goes to the chair maker's company, part goes to the chair desiger, a drip goes to the chair maker.
Discovery of oxygen.
Stop breathing my proprietary gas!
My time zones! Not yours!
My special ï makes all i's mine or I'll sue you into bankrupt poverty.
I own slurred accent (n + 1) and anyone speaking in said accent must cease and desist
Didn't Nestle want to do this with water?
Propietary ownership of bacteria that allow fermentation
I would be surprised if this isn't already a thing
When you're born, Pantone checks your skin color and charges you. You need to get a license before you get tanned or they fine you.
It would be pretty funny if airplane manufacturers trademarked their con-trails, so each type of plain left a different trail behind
If they were all a different color, that'd be pretty damn cool.
Think of the TikTok grifting!
I think current copyright rules are already quite wild enough when applied to digital media, since digital media is literally just made of numbers. Anyone who makes IP automatically owns the number that represents it in a computer.
Plus it's not just that one number. What if you have different resolutions of an image or video? Different file formats or encodings? What if you compress or encrypt the media? Yeah, the copyright holder can enforce that nobody is allowed to use ANY of those numbers. What if you take media and divide it by 2? Probably still copyrighted. What if you divide it by 236832746589? Copyrighted? Probably, yeah, since it would be too easy to take a movie, divide it by that number, and give it to all your friends so they could reproduce the original. I don't even know how to estimate the extremely vast amount of numbers somebody implicitly owns every time they make any piece of IP.
So yeah, literally illegal to count high enough or perform certain forbidden math.
Ownership of specific light spectrums would be fucked up
They do it with radio spectrums.
They literally auction that shit off.
I think Anish Kapoor owns Vantablack if that counts. Technically he probably just owns the right to the paint
He doesn't own it. He has an exclusive license to use it in art. Surrey NanoSystems Limited owns the patent on VantaBlack. Stuart Semple was so angry that Kapoor received that license that he had a blacker black material created and licensed it to anyone but Kapoor. When Kapoor obtained a sample anyway, Semple had a still blacker material created, to spite him.
As much as I dislike Kapoor, technically Vantablack isn't a pigment or regular paint by any means. From my understanding it is actually carbon nano tubes with who knows what else mixed in it and I believe it's actually very dangerous to be around without proper PPE. So in that sense, it makes sense to me that he "owns" it.
Still don't like the guy though.
If it's patented, you can just read the patent to know what else is in it.
You can’t skeet on my ex, I trademarked that ass ;)
Sneezing and breathing in different ways like hyperventilation.