+1 for hex, but that's in a lab setting
climate controlled environment, generally not high torque, pretty benign conditions. But even that is fraught with metric-vs.-imperial mix ups.
qjkxbmwvz
joined 9 months ago
Replace dirt with salt and that's modern artisanal sourdough.
Multiple desktops, 1999. What an amazing feature.
A quick web search suggests that macOS (then OS X) got this in 2007 ("Spaces"), and Windows not until 2015.
This alone makes this GUI more functional IMHO.
BBBZZZSSSSHHHHH!
I rode in a 3 a while back, and to me it felt like a futuristic econobox.
So 84,000 for a glass assuming 100% of the fluid is benzene (unless I misunderstood your calculation). Benzene concentration is about 1% of gasoline, and a tanker is about 20,000L, or ~40,000x more than a cup. Cube root of 40,000 is about 34 (cube root for the surface to volume factor). 34*100 is 3400, which is about 25x off from the 84,000 reduction required to be "safe." So it's roughly 25x worse than the Oregon cutoff (but seemingly within EPA limits, which appears to be ~1000x less stringent [!!!]). Unless I made some errors or misunderstood.
In any event I'll try to source my cooking oil from uncontaminated trucks!
(As an aside, thanks for taking my question seriously and putting thought into an answer, unlike some of the other more "colorful" responses!)
When I first heard Foghat's "Slow Ride" I thought they were saying "Snow White / take it easy!" Which made a lot of sense to college me
this Snow White vixen is really getting down to business...
TIL the cancer rate in the Netherlands is through the roof.
I dunno, seems reasonable to me in the same way that Spanish using "¿" at the beginning of a question makes sense.
That it's inconsistent with other units is certainly annoying, but if anything I think it's the more sensible way.
...scaling laws. They are best illustrated with different sized items. Like a thimble, a coffee cup, or an oil tanker, all representing volumes of different orders of magnitude.
A simple, "your scaling argument doesn't really apply since the amount of residue left behind scales with the volume, not area" would have sufficed.
Gasoline is a pretty powerful solvent; would residue left behind that doesn't come off from gasoline be liberated by cooking oil? It's an honest question.
And I sure hope the regulatory agencies and shipping companies in my country do a better job than in China. This sort of thing is terrifying; I'm just curious as to an emotionless analysis of how bad this likely is. What concentration of benzene is acceptable? "None" would be best but we already breathe it. Would contaminated cooking oil likely be equivalent to...inhaling once at a gas station? A wet martini with diesel instead of vermouth?
Certain crops can benefit think from some shade throughout the day:
I assume that maximal crop output would happen if you just grow things in their optimal climate, but then you rely more heavily on transportation.