I just wish they made toddler clothes in my size.
qjkxbmwvz
Do you still start in 1st? Do you skip gears?
Left pedal looks more like a dead pedal to me.
And as others have said, change in direction is still acceleration. That's part of Newton's (apocryphal?) apple story
he witnessed an apple falling, and wondered why the moon doesn't also fall. His amazing insight is that it does fall (accelerate), it's just that it falls in such a way that it orbits, rather than hits, the Earth (for timescales relevant to a human).
"Political choice is between a turd sandwich and a giant douche" being my favorite example.
Neither candidate is/was ideal, but good lord to say that what's happening now is no different than when the other side was in power is beyond asinine, it's an incredibly disingenuous and offensive take on reality. (I know the SP episode wasn't about the current US political situation, but the current US political situation absolutely has its roots going back to those SP episodes.)
I hope I'm wrong! I'd definitely consider buying some
hopefully you can report back with results. If they're slower than advertised but have the actual capacity that'd still be awesome!
Most of the time that leads to them dying.
Well, squishing has a 100% chance of them dying. With a toddler and a baby, having them run loose sadly isn't an option.
We live in a very mild climate, and there's under-deck and fence space around our house, in addition to bushes, trees, and underbrush
fairly suitable for a variety of arachnids. It's not the same as indoors, and survival rate certainly isn't 100%, but it's not the death sentence of going from a climate controlled house to below-freezing outdoors.
This looks like it might be it:
The drive doesn't provide 4TB of storage either, considering the single NAND chip. That means if you were to attempt to write that much data to the SSD, at some point it would either fail or start overwriting existing data.
Because I can trap mine in a jar and take it outside instead.
I think large planes "look" like they can't work because their "relative speed" is really low
that is, their speed relative to their length. We're used to seeing birds cover tens of lengths per second, whereas a large airliner covers ~1ish per second at takeoff.
Or not, but this always seemed like a plausible explanation as to why planes look impossible. (Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...).
Others mentioned virtualization
I have had issues with COW filesystems (btrfs), as COW does not always play nicely with VM drives (extreme fragmentation and very poor performance).
Maybe there's some interplay between amd64 and x64 architectures.
AMD64 and x64 are the same thing. Do you mean AMD64 and x86? There is definitely interplay there, as AMD64 implements the x86-32 instruction set.
The CW folks would presumably be sending QTH instead
I wonder if this graph captures that/if it would make an appreciable difference?