HopeOfTheGunblade

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I mean, apparently it's that good, so....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The saddest kind of correct.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's my prediction as well, but if the experiment is cheap to run, why not do so, and see of you learn something?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Thanks, I hate it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I've definitely heard it somewhere before...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Here's hoping they aren't spending their liberty dividend on more sniper rifles and tanks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

So for the 99% there is an abolishment of private property, leaving only personal property and public property, everyone has an equal share, and the state has been dissolved?

Because if not, at least one of us doesn't understand communism. It's entirely possible we both don't. Would you be willing to clarify the term as you understand it?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

You know the IOC, who have pretty solid reason to know what they're on about, just released a study on this, and it suggests that trans women have a disadvantage as compared to cis women? Because that fits the actual results, where we haven't seen trans women winning 0.5% of competitions in line with their prevalence, nor more, but less? In any distribution there will always be outliers, but even the ones the people causing a culture war (who, incidentally, did focus groups to find the most effective way to make trans people a wedge issue) have found to trumpet from the skies as a "threat to women's sports" because of trans women's "innate advantages" lose all the time. They have one good day and they're dominating.

What was really fuckin wild to me was multiple mutant Michael Phelps coming out and parroting this opinion. Motherfucker, you have a reduced lactic acid mutation and longer arms than is the norm for your height. Should you be stripped of all of your medals, for your innate advantages? Because he's way more unfair than any trans woman anyone has yet found to present to his competition, but that's fine because.... Why?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

So, in order to avoid having no influence, you use all of your influence to advance someone else's ends? Idk man, seems like you could have told Trump to eat a dick on national TV, told the Republican senators that you were never going to have a better chance to get rid of his ass, and voted to convict and bar him from politics if it passed.

Sure, I don't get to be a senator, but the fuck would I want to be a senator for, if that was the price of entry? You get to be a pawn, and get played? Pass, old man.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

claymores

  1. Anything labeled "This end toward enemy" is dangerous at both ends.
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah, read through this thinking that from my perspective, NTs have some talents I don't, but since they're common people think of them as baseline rather than talents. Shit sucks.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Replace! Ha! Oh blargerer, you are a wit!

view more: ‹ prev next ›