this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
207 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3641 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

"We consider the perp both inferior and also impossibly strong" - police

...sheesh why does that sound so familiar?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've definitely heard it somewhere before...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.

Ur-Fascism, by Umberto Eco

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Also that black people don't feel pain as much so they don't give them anesthetic. Just more lies to justify hurting people.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Gross.

Total aside: there is a group that you can visually identify when it comes to anesthetics. Redheads tend to have a higher tolerance and can need as much as 20% more for the same pain management effects.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

ITYM resistance to anaesthetics, not tolerance. I have a friend who has this gene, even though he wouldn't be considered a red head, it's mostly dark brown with slightly lighter strands.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I've got some ginge in my beard when the light hits it right. Dentists are fun until they get to know you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Doctors were taught the same about black people for 50 years. And a higher tolerance for pain would mean that they need less anesthetic, not more

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think they were saying that redheads have a higher tolerance to anesthetics, not pain

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Yes, I may have worded it a bit poorly

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ex-fucking-cuse me? It's this for real?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yup. It's fucking awful.

In the 2016 study, for example, trainees who believed that black people are not as sensitive to pain as white people were less likely to treat black people’s pain appropriately.

...

What’s more, a meta-analysis of 20 years of studies covering many sources of pain in numerous settings found that black/African American patients were 22% less likely than white patients to receive any pain medication.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't get it. If they believe that black people are less sensitive to pain, then wouldn't a black person complaining of pain actually have a much worse injury and need higher priority treatment?

I know the answer is just racism, but at least get your logic straight.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, but they aren't using logic. Like with women, it's just an excuse to not listen to people they don't like.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

A friend of a friend was at my house party one night, and was going on and on about how black people are stronger than white people, which is why there are so many in sports.

I said "Yeah, that explains why the NHL is all black men."

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

Finding an outstanding misdemeanor warrant for Muhaymin, all four officers attempted to arrest him by wrestling him to the ground. They noted in their official statements that the 43-year-old Black man had “superhuman strength.”

Muhaymin’s autopsy report said he was 5 feet, 5 inches and weighed 164 pounds.

Police out here thinking every black man is pound-for-pound the strongest person in their weight class. Believe in yourself as much as police believe in black peoples strength.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So this is a horrific stereotype, and it has an even more sinister historical precedent.

Back in the era of slavery (that is specifically in the US, the slavery of Africans abducted from their home countries), there were specifically slave "breeding farms" where slavers would commit massive amounts of sexual assault of captive slaves in order to produce slaves they selected by their own arbitrary metric for specific physical qualities... and to save on what can, again horrifically, be referred to as "import costs."

I'm not saying this "worked" or produced the results that slavers wanted. What I am saying is that this specific way of subjugating and dehumanizing people has had lasting effects in both perception of black folks and in the ways that systemic racism works.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I'd say 'trafficked' rather than 'abducted'

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's called "excited delirium" and it exists just as much as smoking marijuana makes Black men super predators.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Probably cukd have used an /s tag on that so people would know you were being facetious. There are still a lot of people who believe both of those things

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

The latter bit was obviously not true. I trust people to be smart enough to make the comparison and understand my intent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Deputy Steven Mills of the Lee County Sheriff’s Office was on patrol one night in 2013 when he received a call about a naked Black man walking down a rural road in Phenix City, Alabama.

Seth Stoughton, a University of South Carolina law professor who served as an expert witness in the George Floyd murder trial, says the term “plays into the racist trope” of a “scary Black assailant.”

Although “superhuman strength” became widely publicized around the 1991 police beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles, its origins date to the post-Civil War Reconstruction era.

The 1915 film “The Birth of a Nation” characterized Black men as rapists and beasts and used that trope to justify lynchings while glamorizing the Ku Klux Klan.

More than 4,400 Black Americans were killed by lynch mobs between 1877 and 1950, according to data from the Equal Justice Initiative, a nonprofit that provides legal representation to people illegally convicted, unfairly sentenced or abused in custody.

Frank Rudy Cooper, a law professor who directs the Program on Race, Gender and Policing at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, says how officers are taught to protect themselves puts them on edge and affects how they approach certain communities.


The original article contains 1,091 words, the summary contains 202 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

super human implies black people aren't human?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yup. Kryptonians, the lot of them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

It's a question of weight distribution of the body. As long as you don't let whoever's trying to subvert you to move your muscles or limbs, it's actually pretty hard to ground somebody.

Perhaps... they've had a lot of training... for some reason..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Let me preface this with this sort of behavior back during slavery was abhorrent. While it’s not true today, selective breeding of a physical trait is a thing that works. Animal husbandry, GMO crops (go look at what corn was 100 years ago), heck even dogs (look at a pug and a wolf and see how much they changed). If I’m not mistaken, even Yao Ming was a product of the Chinese government encouraging two large Chinese basketball players to marry and have children.

Now would a bastard cop use this flimsy excuse to bully a person of color? Of fucking course they would.