DelightfullyDivisive

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Use a little salt substitute on your food. It's potassium salt instead of sodium, and contains a lot more of it than those completely worthless pills.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The general election is two weeks away. What are people voting for in Georgia today?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

They could have, but that doesn't mean that Starlink couldn't do a lot more to catch them at it. You're making excuses for a fascist.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Are you saying that geolocation of a starlink unit is difficult from the starlink satellite network? That seems unlikely to me.

Starlink has no reason outside sanctions to give a fuck where their payments are coming from

Do you see a moral dimension to this? Keeping technology out of the hands of an aggressor state is an excellent reason. I think that many people feel that because corporate entities behave like criminal organizations (indifferent to anything other than maximizing their own profits) that this is somehow OK. It isn't, and normalizing isn't acceptable either.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It takes way less Delta V to push them into solar escape velocity.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Under what circumstances does the first amendment guarantee anonymity?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

What makes you think the other commenter wants chip makers to operate in a free market?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Found the Brit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

People like Musk are cynical, attention-seeking manipulators and narcissists. They aren't afraid that their way of life is being threatened, they're using the fears of others to further their own ends, and consider themselves above it all.

That article was the most cogent take I have seen on this subject. I have a similar cultural background (rednecks and urban, religious Polish-Americans), but see myself as a science-literate atheist. I have seen this first-hand, but wasn't able to articulate it as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Thank you for that!

I think I can say it now, except I keep wanting to put a Scottish "ch" at the end of Llangrannog instead of a "g" sound.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

As an Android user, I completely agree with this statement but probably for different reasons.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I just tried to pronounce the name of that place, and now my tongue hurts. Beautiful picture.

 

I found that things became much more pleasant on here when I blocked hexbear. I recently blocked lemmy.ml as well, but I may reverse that if I find that I'm missing too much good content.

I'm open to other ideas on how to mostly avoid people who love conflict or argue in bad faith.

 
 

I haven't found anything calling this crank science, although it does make some rather sweeping claims. One is that dark matter does not exist, and another is that the universe is 27 billion years old.

https://phys.org/news/2024-03-universe-dark.html

 

I have read several articles like this one.

https://www.livescience.com/space/cosmology/james-webb-telescope-confirms-there-is-something-seriously-wrong-with-our-understanding-of-the-universe

They all seem to be saying that there is a "crisis in cosmology", where different measurements can't reconcile what the value of the hubble constant is.

Then I watched this video last night that seems to be saying it's all just tweaking different models.

https://youtu.be/2pux7v9qJ58?si=ux3zBSHR-vvsz9qY

I'm not entirely sure if they're talking about two slightly different things. (Hubble's constant, and the predicted age of the universe.) Or if the "crisis" is really just a misunderstanding, or just clickbait tactics. Any informed opinions on the subject?

view more: next ›