But how your body senses a full bladder isn’t known. Certain proteins can be activated by cells being stretched or squeezed. One gene, called PIEZO2, holds the instructions to make such proteins. PIEZO2 has been shown to play a role in sensing mechanical stimulation, including touch, vibration, pain, and proprioception (the awareness of one’s body in space).
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
50 points (93.1% liked)
Ask Lemmy
26734 readers
1480 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Pee zo 2
You'd think it'd just be pressure receptors inside the bladder, but we've gotten a few interesting case studies from astronauts who report urinary retention in zero-g.
Your bladder is just a muscle-bag that stretches and collapses like a balloon depending on its volume, so pressure from the urine wouldn't change much in zero-g vs normal g.
Makes me wonder if the receptor that triggers the need to pee is under and completely separate from the bladder, activated by the downward force of a heavy bladder laying on it.
Easy enough to test: if you need to pee, hang your torso off the side of the bed or do a handstand or something so the gravitational force on the bladder is reversed -- did the urge to pee go away?
Your bladder is just a muscle-bag that stretches and collapses like a balloon depending on its volume, so pressure from the urine wouldn't change much in zero-g vs normal g.
Have you used, for example, one of those camp showers? Water is heavy. Gravity builds up pressure fairly quickly, and it's going through a pretty small pipe.
it's going through a pretty small pipe
Speak for yourself
Urethras are all narrow, regardless of their enormous meat casing, n'est-ce pas?
Pure guesswork because I'm way too lazy to dig:
There's the actual pressure of the liquid, then the muscles that hold the pee in have to strain more to resist that pressure.
You know what? I liked your answer. You didn't claim it was truth, and it started a discussion. I think it sounds like a reasonable enough theory, it's probably weirder than that, because that's usually how things be, but I like how you think!
Plus someone else would inevitably come up with the same comment anyway as it's the intuitive answer even if another comment disproves it.
Guesses are fine as long as they're marked as such, and will often not be that far from the real answer and can trigger someone else to dig deeper and further add.
Even if you end up completely wrong, now that's a searchable thread with child comments disproving it.
I bet if this comment just claimed this is what happens, nobody would complain and it would have more upvotes. If I tell you I'm 90% sure I'm right, that doesn't discredit my analysis, I'm just being honest about what I don't know, at least the reader can make the determination as to whether it's good enough for them or not. This is social media not a peer reviewed scientific journal.
I see that kind of crap all over politics too. Candidate A is honest and replies with nuances, candidate B makes bold claims, people vote candidate B because A "looks weak and indecisive".
Eventually we’ll be able to have civilized conversations without mentioning it.
But until then, thank you guys for this awkward but wholesome display of mutual respect.
Whoever downvoted this comment is a very small person.