this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
919 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck AI

2331 readers
258 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 94 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

I'm more surprised that people still use Google search at all after the years of enshittification — first the SEO crap, then "personalized search" bubbles, and finally the "AI" idiocy. Even shouting questions down a wishing well seems more productive at this point.

[–] [email protected] 104 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Not to sound confrontational, but you're way too focused on your - likely rather advanced - usage.

90% of people search for very simple stuff. They want to know the weather or want to know about that new movie they don't quite remember the name of. And for that use case, Google is perfectly serviceable. And since people are used to it, for example by it being the default on most platforms, they use it.

A lot of market leaders are objectively a bad choice, but they're a known brand. Coca cola, McDonald's, Oracle, etc.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think you sound confrontational, but neither do I consider my internet searching particularly advanced. A lot of my searches are exactly what you describe, and a lot is trying to find a good research rabbit hole to go down. Call me curious.

I'm just sceptical, primarily of Google Search's inroads into surveillance monetisation and effective monopoly. For the same reasons I am as critical of the other "market leaders" you mention; I don't consider the ability to inspire brand loyalty in millions of consumers to sell crap products a quality 🤷

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would honestly consider anyone that uses Lemmy or the Fediverse to be more advanced than the average user.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, etc all suffer the same problems. I’d love to hear other alternatives (and I don’t mean alternatives like searx that is little more than lipstick on a pig and proxies search results from said engines).

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

DuckDuckGo is just Bing wearing a duck hat

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There's nothing perfect. I use Kagi which uses many other indexes including Google, but with a focus on "small web" results and no ads or mandatory AI nonsense.

...but it costs money.

Well worth it in my opinion. My results have been better than Google for me, and I've been using it for like a year now. Highly recommend.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

I learned about kagi when I got here on Lemmy and I've been using it since. Sucks that it costs money but they're not making money elsewhere, that i know of, so it can't just be a loss leader and free.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

How is DuckDuckGo shitty? It suits me fine.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Google supports searching "specific phrases", -excluding_words, +ensuring_keywords, and whatever * is. I havent found any other indexers that allow me to make use of searches with that level of detail, which is often the only way you can find specific things these days.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Duckduckgo does plenty with its advanced search operators, which are pretty similar to Google's. * is a wildcard, meaning if you were to search c*y, results word return something including a sequence beginning with 'c' and ending with 'y', but having any sequence of characters in between them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Left out shadow banning raw footages on YT while front page promoting the same footage with heavy edits and narration that lied about what happened ('see no resisting'). -Leading to riots, increased racism, civil unrest, anti-cop sentiment, innocent lives, jobs, and property lost, etc. All to distract us from a racist genocide they support.

Yandex is the only search I'm aware of that passes tests (using verifiable facts) on the subject. -Grok the only AI.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

equivalent of spraying graffiti to keep the rents down.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

9mm cartridges are about $0.25 each. Occasionally popping off about $2 worth can save you $400/mo.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Did we just solve the rent/housing crisis?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

"The Gang Solves The Housing Crisis"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I think you just made the most compelling case ever for liberals owning guns.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Only as long as the graffiti is bad/sloppy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure. Rich people don't want to live anywhere where poor people also live.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When I become a millionaire, I would live next door to rich people but in (apparently) dirty and ugly clothes. I would put three colours on the roof of my mansion and grow a hideous front yard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 weeks ago

just tested, works well. fuck

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sounds like it’d be a worthwhile browser extension to insert that into every search.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Sudo apt install thefuck

No wait

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Huh, these are not the Laurel & Hardy films I used to watch ...

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but that, uh, also alters her search results.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

-fuck

Seems to still work and not affect the search. In my limited testing that is. If this keeps working someone just needs to create a extension the auto adds -fuck to all searches.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

But what if I don't want to exclude "fuck?" That would filter out half of my code comments

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good luck searching for porn with that exclusion.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Google doesn't show AI for porn searches.

Bing continues to be the best porn search engine.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Google respects AI's privacy more than people's? ~/s~

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Seems like more work than installing ublock origin and using duck duck go.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

duck duck go has been giving me AI summaries / suggestions

You can turn it off but if your cookies are cleared you have to do it again.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Works. DON’T TELL ANYONE OR ELSE THEYLL FIX IT.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

OMG it really does!!!

Fucking cheat code!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

This is gonna be fun

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck it works pretty well too

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Or you could just...stop using Google?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

I suppose we can empirically test that. Time to fuck around and find out i guess

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck!

Ok so I will do that going forward...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Fucking great

load more comments
view more: next ›