this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
861 points (98.8% liked)

News

28227 readers
4542 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican President Donald Trump said on Sunday he was not joking about seeking a third presidential term, which is barred by the U.S. Constitution, but that it was too early to think about doing so.

Trump, who took office on January 20 for his second, non-consecutive White House term, has made vague allusions to seeking a third one but addressed it directly on Sunday in a telephone interview with NBC News.

"No, I'm not joking. I’m not joking," Trump said, but "it is far too early to think about it."

"There are, there are methods which you could do it, as you know," he said. He declined to elaborate on any specific methods.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

“There are, there are methods which you could do it, as you know,”

Those methods are:

Serving as VP, followed by ascension - The 12th Amendment says no one ineligible to be president can be VP, but the 22nd Amendment only bars election to a third term, not holding office. Trump could potentially be Vance's (or someone else's) VP, then that President resigns, making Trump president for a third term without being elected. This is legally untested and would be widely challenged. It doesn't seem like a route Trump would take.

Repealing the 22nd Amendment - This requires the proposal and ratification of a new amendment. This new amendment must be passed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress, or by a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of state legislatures, followed by ratification from three-fourths of the states. This is an unlikely path for Trump to take. Even with massive cheating, he would never get the numbers in his favor.

Ignoring the 22nd Amendment - AKA the "what the fuck you gonna do" method, which the Trump regime has employed with great success in lots of other areas. This is almost certainly what he means.

Any other method to remain president, such as declaring martial law, declaring a national emergency, using the Insurrection Act, etc, would basically be a military coup that would spark a civil war and Balkanize the US.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Tl:dr; those methods are lying and cheating

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago

He's the oldest president the States has ever had, hopefully he'll die before his term is over.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump running for a third term is basically the plot of Civil War (2024).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

If you wanna read how prescient that movie really was, here's Matt Zoller Seitz's 4 star review of it.

https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/civil-war-movie-review-2024

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago

I mean, literally nobody on either side thought he was.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

until it's actually time for the next election, all of the third term bullshit is functionally serving only to distract from signalgate and dismantling the courts/gov etc. do not lose focus. (edit: typo fix)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Trump says shit all day like a fire hose just to spread terror and keep everyone muddied. But he's old and will die sooner than later. The question is if MAGA manages to continue his style.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

The Paranoid Style in American Politics was published in 1964. They’ve been using it to great success for the past century, why stop now?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Sooner hopefully

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If Trump runs for a third term, Obama should too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, that just legitimizes it for no real benefit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They don't care about legitimacy, they brew their own at home. Though I'm not too keen on Drone Strikes McGee coming back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago

He doesn’t lie about what he wants to do.

He lies about his accomplishments.

It’s been like this since his first term. He’s not lying about invading Greenland or punishing Canada into being the 51st state. He absolutely wants to. Assuming (hopefully) that both these endeavors never materialize, he will claim that these threats accomplished some other goal that was made up on the spot. Which will be a lie.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The only thing keeping most people quiet is the idea that Trump is temporary. This will not bode well for stability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Trump may be temporary , but his puppetmasters aren't.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's proven that he does not care about court orders or rules of law, so I doubt he'd be against ripping up the constitution. Not an American so forgive me if I seem ignorant on this, but I hope that there's failsafes against him getting a third term no matter what he does.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There are not. Fascism has only ever been defeated in two ways: Ballot or Bullet. And wouldn't you know it, we're fresh out of Ballots.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Most states probably won't even let him register for presidential election.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hasn't the Supreme Court already ruled on this when Colorado tried it? It was pretty clear then that he violated the 14th Amendment. So what's the 22nd to them this time? The deed will be done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I believe they commented it was fine for colorado to enforce the 35 yrs old requirement because its clear cut and there's no process needed to make that determination. The 22nd amendment doesn't require any determination process, so its unlikely they'll be able to bar it without letting toddlers run for president

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›