It wasnt really an issue until now π. Who would have though a founding member of NATO would go to the other side!
But Europe weaned themselves off Russian gas, they can rebuild their own domestic defence industry.
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
129 points (97.1% liked)
Europe
2500 readers
1747 users here now
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
(This list may get expanded when necessary.)
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
Yet another clue pointing the way to free software. Maybe this time they'll follow it?
Nah, they'll use proprietary EU software instead. That'll solve everything. Promise ;)
Better that than proprietary US software I guess π€· But yes, EU digital infrastructure should run on FOSS software as much as possible
That'll be nice, but think about Siemens: they are totally depending on Microsoft. Should I mention governments as well? EU can invest heavily in well established software companies like Canonical (UK based, creator of Ubuntu) which had their own OS for mobile (Ubuntu Touch).
Go for all Linux, all open source
The MS lobby is too strong. Many years and many countries tried to get away to linux and many ended up going back because of lobbying or just because it's simpler to pay millions to a single place.
That's just article about software. Software is easy replaceable and relativly low cost compared to hardware. And who needs software if you don't have hardware to run it.
Europe is lacking semiconductor companies after almost all died. The last one are NXP and Infineon but can't compare them to TSMC Intel or Samsung. ARM is just a documentation and licensing company. TSMC foundry in Dresden is planned for 2027 and it's at most 22nm process for cars. If China starts with Taiwan only country capable to go lower than 5nm is USA and maybe Samsung in Korea right now.
There's STMicroelectronics too.
Decades of willful ignorance and now they're stating the obvious as if it came as a biblical revelation.
Canada has the same issue. The government of Canada is heavily invested in American-based cloud services. It's a strategic threat.
People looked at me wide-eyed when I said "I hope the US votes for Trump" and explained he would finally force the world to decouple from that anti-democratic oligarchy. But they were too addicted to USAian products to listen. When such articles come around, my glee increases.
Fuck you very much Trump. And thank you.
All the worst for the best! Europe had went through a lot in its history, but we are still here. But will the USA survive this? I hope not...
That's why I'm with Zizek on his take that he would vote for Trump if he was an American. Accelerationism works.
That would just increase the trade deficit and would make Trump even more mad about the EU economy outcompeting the US.
In reality software and digital services are a product category that is extremely easy to substitute. The emperor has no cloth in that regard.
Weeeelll, we are not quite there yet. DDOS protection for example, only proper company in the EU is Myra, but they cost 10k/month minimum.
Other places are trying but its rough around the edges. For example hetzner does not have all products in terraform, some of their IPs are on blocklists and they don't care, etc.
Bitdefender is a Romanian company. They might have something for you.
The problem for large institutions is that they very often have specialized software relying on some American software or being American themself. More often then not that means converting large amounts of data from a propietary format into something useable by another software. The company selling the original software obviously does not want that to happen at all. Also both programs work in different ways, so data might have to be split in non obvious ways.
Then you need to retrain the workforce to use the new software, which probably does not work properly to begin with.
There are also often dependencies. Like Microsoft Office Add-Ins from third party vendors. They will not like going to Libre Office and it is likely not easy either.
Not saying it is impossible, but a transition takes years and is going to lead to some serious problems.
This legacy type software doesn't stop working over night, and while the move to cloud services is more worrying in that regard, this problem is mostly a legal one and the EU could easily change its laws if it would see a need. In fact recent EU legislation explicitly allows suspending patent and copyright protections if foreign software vendors are trying to weaponize this.
[citation needed]
At least on end user devices, It's not easy at all to move completely to non-US operating systems. Quite a few places tried and failed to move to Linux.
The critical parts of Android are open source. Many Chinese vendors have versions for the Chinese market that do not depend on any US non-foss software components and the EU could easily do the same. Development would probably slow down, but a smartphone from 5 years ago (with security patches) is not really worse than a brand new one.
The failure of bureocracies to move to Linux is and was organisational and political, not technical.
I am not saying that US software and services are not the most convenient. That is why they dominate the EU market of course, but they are not essential and there is no technical or legal (patents) reason why they they couldn't be substituted quite easily.
Anyways, it is largely a political choice of the EU to import these services, as the US has little else to offer and as good allies (in the past) we found ways to make it work despite the glaring economic imbalance of the US economy.
The failure of bureocracies to move to Linux is and was organisational and political, not technical.
True, but that doesn't make it any easier. People are very, very stubborn and dumb about this and at least here in Germany most people (including politicians) don't even see the issue with being entirely dependent on US tech corporations. And that's despite the huge scandal about the US secret service literally spying on the German chancellor's phone.
Quite a few places tried and failed to move to Linux.
Do. Or do not. There is no try.
... by which I mean that the attempts that failed were not real attempts. It's like giving up fossil fuels. You know the right thing to do. The benefits are long-term. Immense as they seem, the transition costs are temporary. That it's difficult is not a good reason not to do it.