this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
726 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

62073 readers
4917 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 304 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Maybe asking advertisers to 'go fuck yourselves' isn't such a bright idea, fuckwit.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can also have friends if you just pay mercenaries to kidnap them from the street at gunpoint. Many many great friends at any time.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You just know that's going to be exhibit 1 for the defense.

Fucking fascist Nazi man baby doesn't like when advertisers do what he tells them, and then continues to do so when he realizes that was a bad idea.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 193 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I’m honestly blown away that Nestle stopped or reduced advertising. It seems like twitter is exactly the home for such a terrible company.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not if there's fewer there to see ads. They're still a business with a bottom line, even if what they do is terrible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Nestle has an extremely safe, risk-averse marketing strategy. In part due to their various scandals, they try really hard to be family friendly and boring.

That said, they are not worse than other food and beverage conglomerates.

  1. child labor: mars & others were also implicated. These companies were most likely unaware of the child labor being used to harvest cocoa. The way it works is there are wholesalers in Africa who buy cocoa from processing facilities who buy fresh cocoa pods from local farms. These wholesalers advertised themselves as being child-labor-free. The farms they buy from were using child labor. This is a problem with capitalism exploiting people in the global south, causing perverse incentives, and with companies having limited insight into the full depth of their supply chains.

  2. water is not a human right: The nestle water exec said the quiet part out loud. But, no beverage company believes water is a human right - they just aren't stupid enough to say that on camera. If they did think it was a human right, they'd be working to ensure universal access to clean water rather than bottling it and shipping it around the world while limiting water access at their extraction points and polluting the water near their factories. Look at what coca cola is doing in mexico - rampant water pollution such that in factory towns Coke is the only safe drink for folks because the water is contaminated. Nestle is bad, but no worse than coca cola.

  3. infant formula scandal: this occurred in the 1970s and was obviously awful. Every major multinational food and beverage conglomerate has stories like this if you look hard enough - this just happens to be a fucked up series of events that got some major media play.

People online scapegoat Nestle, but continue to buy electronics and clothing made with child labor, tree nuts/soda/and other products known to be harmful to watersheds, and many other products from companies which harm people in the global south. This isn't meant to defend nestle, but to remind everyone that there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Nestle is not anywhere close to an uniquely evil company. Not even in its own industry.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The company might be terrible, but most of their buyers are normal people who either don't know what brands belong to them, or don't care enough to carefully investigate everything they buy. And those normal people are the ones the ads need to reach. If they leave twitter, what's the point of advertising there?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 161 points 1 week ago (3 children)

All the defense has to do is play the clip of him openly telling advertisers not to advertise and he'll get laughed out of court.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most politicians are bought for less than a million. The guy has hundreds of billions. I imagine he can buy a few judges along the way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

In an actual court? In Trumps america?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 137 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know you've fucked up when even Nestlé doesn't want to work with you...

Obligatory Fuck Nesté

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When people go we may use child slaves in our supply chain, steal and ruin water supplies, and bribe medical professionals to get discourage breastfeeding, but you're too fucked up for us to work with then you know you've fucked up.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be clear, its not that twitter is too fucked up for nestle to work with, they absolutely would if they thought it would benefit them. Its that twitter has become so toxic that they see advertising there as a net negative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The lesson here is to never start advertising on that platform. You’re less likely to be sued by Musk if you never start advertising in the first place. Advertising on his platform is an unnecessary risk for your business:

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago

Preach. Never do business with a professional troll.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Can someone explain to me how you can sue over a business choosing to not spend their advertising dollars on a particular service? I mean Elon specifically told his customers to “fuck off” and now he’s suing them?!? I just don’t understand these petulant little man children being so litigious when they get their feefees hurt.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Easy, you pack courts with shills, you eliminate government oversight, and then you do whatever you want.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The actual "easy" part is that you can sue anyone for pretty much anything. Suing is entirely different from winning the case.

Why they think they have a chance of winning is the weirder question, especially when Musk publically told the advertisers to go fuck themselves.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't have to win, just drag the case out, causing both sides to spend fortunes on legal fees. Guess who has the most money.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

X has an estimated market cap of $9.4 billion, whereas Nestlé has a market cap of $219 billion. That's a corporate superpower with no qualms about monopolizing freshwater or bait- & switching breast milk formula from babies. And it's just one of the companies they're taking on, with a shitty case to boot. So yeah... if I was Elon I would keep my head down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 week ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Nothing says you believe in free market competition more, than suing another private business, trying to force them to give you money

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How long until Tesla sues me for buying a Toyota?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't know Citizens United gave companies forced speech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Can you please tag this elon, so that our spam filters work?

It's not practical to censor "x"

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Last year he told everybody to go fuck themselves. Now he's crying. If there is somebody who needs to be deported, is it his narcistic, selfish, apartheid's ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago

Hey Elmo, you told the advertisers to “go fuck yourself” in no uncertain terms, even repeating yourself for dramatic effect.

Hey I’ve got an idea Elmo. Go fuck yourself.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In a sane world, this lawsuit would be laughed out of court.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's harder to laugh it out of court when the plaintiff is in the government himself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago

If suing companies for not advertising on your platform made any sense, porn sites could sue almost the whole economy.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

i don't understand how it's a boycott or how is illegal or unfair

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's not a boycott, neither is it illegal. He's literally just being a crybaby and believes that anybody not pandering to his business model should be forced by the courts to give him money regardless.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"I ruined my business by supporting Nazis and it's all your fault!"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Musk is not just supporting Nazis, he is a flaming Nazi himself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago

How dare your company not advertise on my company cause I’m a racist wanna be nazi twat.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago

No better way to get people who used to voluntarily give you money to give you more money than threatening them.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

Oh yes Nestle, the infamously lefty liberals.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (6 children)

wtf is musk even expecting to gain here

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

He's gone crazy from power. People like that are dangerous.

P.S. He acts like some Russian government official tied to organised crime, who now think he owns this country and can do anything in there.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago

Throwing a temper tantrum because no-one wants to play with you. What a child!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Are boycotts illegal? In this case I doubt there was an organized attempt, just some companies making individual business decisions. But even if Twitter can prove there was a boycott, is there a law against that?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Boycotts are absolutely legal, you are completely entitled to decide who you don't want to do business with. However, illegality is no longer required for the justice system to be weaponized against you, and President Musk just wants to make an example to others who might not want to do business with an actual Nazi.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This donkey about to get taught a lesson by nestle. He probably thinks he's hot shit now but he poked the devil.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yes, sue literally every company in America, nothing could possibly go wrong.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

Suing companies for not advertising on a platform For Nazis, By Nazis™. 🤡

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

Life goals, don't fuck up so bad that even Nestle wont work with you!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

tHe mArKeT WiLl ReGuLaTe ItSeLf!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nazi vs Nestle. Always win for us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

How is this even a thing? Is a bank run considered collusion? If the platform no longer offers the audience I want to reach then I should be able to stop advertising on it. It just happens that the audience of may companies at once left the company. Who is even entertaining this lawsuit?

load more comments
view more: next ›