BigDanishGuy

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

Why not just stick to what we've always been doing?

  1. wget something.tar.gz
  2. tar something.tar.gz
  3. man tar
  4. tar xzf something.tar.gz
  5. cd something
  6. ls -al
  7. ./config.sh
  8. chmod +x config.sh
  9. ./config.sh
  10. make config
  11. Try to figure out where to get some obscure dependency, with the right version number. Discover that the last depency was hosted on the dev's website that the dev self-hosted when it went belly up 5 years ago. Finally find the lib on some weird site with a TLD you could have sworn wasn't even in latin characters.
  12. make config
  13. make
  14. Go for coffee
  15. make install
  16. SU root
  17. make install
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

IANAL (goes without saying, I guess)

If the city of Springfield can document damages resulting from Vance's lies, then the city should definitely try to recoup their expenses. But from Vance personally, not the campaign org. The organization will be shut down by mid November and Springfield isn't going to get a ruling before then. Besides, are we sure whether the campaign organization is even responsible for what unvetted shit a candidate spews?

Could this be a class action? I mean the city had OT to the police, but individuals had to miss work, kids missed school, and many other people were terrified. IDK but this smells like punitive damages.

Legal Eagle should do a take on this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Comment updated

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Comment updated

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Comment updated

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Oh I totally think you're right in applying Hanlon's razor here. The opposite would spell doom.

But sometimes you've got to wonder how incompetent can they be. And at those times "they're not babbling buffoons, it's a clever ruse" seems a plausible explanation. I mean Trump parading his mistress on the campaign trail, what the actual fuck?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Imagine thinking you got Lemmy by suggesting that Vietnam should have counter invaded America

  1. What? "You've got Lemmy" is that a parallel universe Jennifer Anniston and Adam Sandler movie?
  2. Total suicide mission, but Vietnam taking Portland, Oregon, would have been weird.
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

You think they don't? See

  1. Kyrsten Sinema
  2. Joe Manchin
[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago

Demonetization s*cks. I was just about to get a rescue yacht for my staff's yacht and then boom my most profitable lemmy comments got demonetized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Oh yes, yes YES! Maybe we could do a casting call for unknown voluptuous clean shaven chesterfield couches?

Does bring a different meaning to the backroom casting couch concept.

 

As the title states really. I need to refer to this diverse group of people, who somehow have gotten put in the same box labeled "sexual minorites".

I'm a boring CISHET vanilla white male, so I don't really know. I want to include as many as I can when I refer to "lgbtq+ people". I've been studying various flags, trying to find the one flag I need. But I can't really figure it out.

Is lgbtq+ the preferred term, or what should I use? Is a flag better? I don't want to hurt someone by not including them.

view more: next ›