this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
685 points (93.9% liked)

politics

19594 readers
3501 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"If the purges [of potential voters], challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast."

"[...] Democracy can win* despite the 2.3% suppression headwind.

And that’s our job as Americans: to end the purges, the vigilante challenges, the ballot rejections and the attitude that this is all somehow OK."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This is why Kamala accepting the outcome "No matter what", to prove she's better than Trump...

Was the dumbest thing she could have done because it was just playing into the GOP's hand.

The Republican game is "You go high, we go low, because low gets us elected and furthers our agenda."

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Oh please. We had the same shit in 2020 and we had a record turn out.

Don't put the blame on voter suppression when it's American stupidity and apathy that's the cause.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

It is in the end stupidly and apathy. But, you can't deny that voter suppression is also a big thing and it should be addressed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

But it can be both. Voter suppression just making it way harder for Democrats to win. And ultimately impossible.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago

I knew that this was going to happen as soon as they started purging voter rolls and passing draconian voter suppression laws after Trump lost. Biden just barely beat Trump in 2020, so all they had to do was give Trump a little bump - a few thousand votes nullified here or there would win him a whole state. The media focus in 2020 was on the "historic turnout", but how many of those were covid mail-in ballots that red states didn't allow this time? How many people showed up on election day ready to vote for Kamala only to get turned away because they weren't on the registry even though they voted in 2020?

Republicans cheated in more than one way this time, and we got screwed because we failed to stop it early.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dem pols are always too afraid to exercise the power they have when they win. Always. When Biden won, DC and Puerto Rican statehood should have been the first things on the agenda.

The GOP is never afraid to exercise as much power as they can get away with.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Biden never had enough control of the whole government to get those things done without Republican buy-in.

A Republican controlled house won't send a bill like that to the Senate. A Republican controlled Senate won't send it to the President.

You can be upset at Biden, but we've rarely ever given a Democratic president a Democratic Congress to help him get anything done.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Uh, no. He had a Democratic congress the first half of his term. Part of why he lost them is Dems are so tepid with exercising the power the voters give them.

Nothing the Dems do, or even try to do, gin the base up into excitement. The base never feels inspired that the Dems are striving for the goals they claim to represent and want.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 days ago (2 children)

One lesson 2020 should have taught everyone and that's vote by mail WORKS.

Lifting the restrictions on vote by mail for Covid won the election for Biden, and replacing those restrictions in 2024 lost it for Harris.

We should have 100% vote by mail in all states.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 days ago

vote by mail WORKS.

Which is why red states didn't want to use it. Can't stay in power if you don't suppress votes.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

One lesson 2020 should have taught everyone and that’s vote by mail WORKS.

It was a lesson national administrators learned. That's why it was heavily clawed back. 2020 was a big year for Popular Socialist Candidates. Neither party enjoyed a wave year that included The Squad and put a guy like Bernie Sanders in arm's reach of Biden after Super Tuesday.

We should have 100% vote by mail in all states.

Republicans have been outspoken in opposition to mail-in voting, particularly for younger college-aged voters. But even Dems are lackluster in their support for full enfranchisement, on the grounds that higher participation tends to make controlling primaries more difficult and expensive (the NY-14 upset by AOC being a classic example).

Incidentally How Voting Laws Have Changed in Battleground States Since 2020: Most have made it harder to vote, but others have expanded access.

load more comments
view more: next ›