Bidding war. Zuckerberg paid more.
Your move China.
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
283 points (97.3% liked)
politics
19398 readers
3209 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
A platform that probably helped him a lot becoming the president. How ironic.
Check bounced? Nah he got the check and it cleared and the world's tiniest gear spun in his head and he thought "what if 2 checks?!?!!?".
Imagine having your entire business plans hanging on the whims of this orange dickhead.
I suspect it's a share price influencing game with some of his pals.
Guess they didn't donate enough to his inauguration fund.
Lol..
Man, I really hope he does the double-flipflop on this and bans it again. Because Tiktok pulled the stunt this weekend to kiss his ass, blocking the app preemptively for the USA and crediting Trump with "saving" it with the popup message. This would be most disruptive to the propaganda pushers on both sides of the globe, and piss off the most people against them.
it still amuses that people expect anything else from his presidency. it will be a "highest bidder wins" war.
u-turning so fast he's basically drifting in circles.
Trump holds no convictions outside filling his ego hole. He will go with whatever the most influential person that talked to him last. His u-turn here doesn't surprise me in the slightest.
It will be especially funny because they have had a lot more conservative type join as well, and based off everyone complaining about their "algorithm" it seems like those types are enjoying themselves...
Did the check not clear?
Meta dropped a bigger check maybe.
Elno reminded him he owns both X and Trump.
Probably did. Could easily be a grifter move to dupe them into writing another check. Suckers.
I'm getting whiplash from all the backtracking and it's only day two.
"Donald Trump says dumb fucking thing after other dumb fucking contradictory thing"
The Onion should just print this headline every day for the next 4 years.
Nah, that's too realistic for The Onion. It needs to be something like, 'Pandemonium Ensues After Trump Utters First Coherent Sentence.'
And this strategy works for him just fine. People who like him will believe the thing they want to hear and some of the people who would have opposed him will be confused and delay action because they think maybe it's just going to work out and they should focus elsewhere.
I was sticking with rednote anyway.
spoiler
Even if this were psy-ops... this is how you write psy-ops, goddamn
Are we the psy-op going to chinese social media and humanizing Americans or are they the psy-op by acting human when the Americans show up?
If it's the first, where's my check? If it's the second, congrats to my chinese spy on landing the easiest job in the world.
I was sticking to not joining social media owned by people who want to make profit with my info...
Did tiktok not offer to kiss his ass or pay him tribute like all the other companies?
i think zuckerberg kissed his ass harder and more affectionately than tiktok did
They're not letting him have a cut of the company cake.
This is leverage, nothing more. He has every intention of saving it. He's just going to make sure that he gets his cut and assurances that any anti-Trump videos be scrubbed and any searches return no results. And he wants to make sure they continue to do what he wants, when he wants, and the way he wants by literally hanging a potential ban over their heads that he can sign into effect by EO at the stroke of his favorite sharpie.
It is literally a Mafia protection racket on steroids.
I disagree. Trump and Musk own competitors to TokTok.
They are not going to hurt themselves in order to help a Chinese competitor.
Also, they are now in the ones in charge AND the Chinese government is actually using TikTok to spy on THEM.
load more comments
(1 replies)
let me guess? Zuckerberg phoned him up and reminded him of all that lovely lobby money that had been shared around!
He logged in and instead of seeing people praising him, he saw people continue to mock him and call him a dumb, fascist, piece of shit.
How does this lower the cost of my eggs?
You can suck on Trump’s eggs for a million. Dale Huevo!!
You missunderstood. This ends the war in Ukraine
load more comments
(2 replies)
That was a strange video to listen to. He wants the US to own half... Like nationalizing the platform?
He wants his cut, like the mafia
To "wet his beak"
I don't think he understands the difference between a government and a corporation. Like, he imagines the US is just his now. Just a big hotel, he can buy and sell bits of it to make money. Buy Greenland and Tiktok, sell Puerto Rico and the USS George Bush. Add a cover charge for Canada and Mexico.
To be fair, at this point there is barely any difference.
load more comments
(2 replies)
He's talking big so that Tiktok sells their US operations to Elon. Then he gets to take credit as a deal maker.
After the pump, comes the dump.
What a capricious shit.
I think it's a threat to ensure that TikTok does what he says. Lots of reports (that I as an Australian can't verify before it works for me) of searches for Trump incriminating videos are returning no results since it came back. It feels like there were conditions on not banning TikTok.
What pisses me off the most is that he blatantly places no consideration about the security implications of this decision. It is just about making a deal for his tech bros.
He doesn’t give a flying fuck about the country. He’d burn it all down if it could turn a profit for him.
view more: next ›