If he's wrong (and I think he is) then doesn't his turning off his camera become obstruction of justice? If not, what would this be considered?
bradinutah
I expected this to be nottheonion.
"Here's your free vacation, sir!"
Better systems existed but to your point, they were not well known.
Leaders today, with access to Wikipedia if not researchers with Nobel prizes, do NOT have this excuse.
This is the way. It is possible and unlikely to have a third party win under the right conditions, like with how the Republican Party became a national party after Lincoln was elected as a third party candidate. But ultimately there will always only be two parties with the outdated FPTP voting method. If only George Washington knew about and pushed for a better voting system than FPTP.
If only Weird 34 was cool and coherent enough to quote Smash Mouth (and not get sued). Instead we get diarrhea dialogue.
Plus we keep using this outdated first-past-the-post voting system in the 21st century.
DonOLD was convicted of 34 felony counts in New York. He hopes people don't keep his factual criminality on the top of their minds. The purpose and motive of the crime was to deceive voters. It's election fraud.
Weird 34 does a lot of projection. It's all making sense now.
You may have missed the point of the debate, which is to help people on the fence choose a side. Anyone on the fence HAS been asleep the last 8 years and ought to not choose to side with Cult 34 and their rude, misguided values. I expect many a boomer MAGAt has a wet dream of the rapist groping her on stage.
Just like his criminal defense in NY. Criminal has concepts but nothing concrete.
"Take us to your leader!"