this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
355 points (98.6% liked)

News

23627 readers
2156 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Trump transition weighs plan to cancel USPS contracts to build large EV fleet
    
    Postal service plans to spend billions on EV chargers and roughly 66,000 new trucks Contract cancellation likely part of sweeping executive order on EVs

Dec 6 (Reuters) - Donald Trump's transition team is considering canceling the U.S. Postal Service's contracts to electrify its delivery fleet, as part of a broader suite of executive orders targeting electric vehicles, according to three sources familiar with the plans.

The move, which could be unveiled in the early days of Trump’s administration that begins on Jan. 20, is in line with Trump's campaign promises to roll back President Joe Biden’s efforts to decarbonize U.S. transportation to fight climate change – an agenda Trump has said is unnecessary and potentially damaging to the economy.

Reuters has previously reported that Trump is planning to kill a $7,500 consumer tax credit for electric vehicle purchases, and plans to roll back Biden's stricter fuel-efficiency standards.

The sources told Reuters that Trump’s transition team is now reviewing how it can unwind the postal service's multibillion-dollar contracts, including with Oshkosh (OSK.N), and Ford (F.N) for tens of thousands of battery-driven delivery trucks and charging stations.

Oshkosh shares fell by roughly 5% to 105.65 per share after the Reuters report.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 125 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Hey look! Let's just raise a huge middle finger to what's left of our ecosystems.

How did it go? Yes, humanity was destroyed, but for one moment we maximized profits!

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not to mention that carriers love the new trucks.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because they're heated and actually safe to drive and don't break down every two months like the old mail vehicles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago (3 children)

At this point, it's not really about maximizing profits, it's about trying to undo every change Biden made

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (6 children)

At this point, it’s not really about maximizing profits, it’s about trying to undo every change Biden made

Its even worse. The new truck was likely by Dejoy, Trump's own appointee.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

Trump's is Putin's puppet. He's set to destroy whatever he can.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The way he talked about Putin making Obama look dumb... he thinks that when you act like an asshole and tear down what someone built that it makes the other person look bad.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

That's cause he's a bully. He's only ever brought people down to bring himself up. He thinks this is the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Trump doesn't care. He's going to be dead in a few years and as far as he's concerned, the entire universe could instantly implode afterward.

In fact, he probably thinks the universe ends when his finite energy battery that keeps his fat ass from exercising gives out.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those trucks get like six miles to the gallon, they're a massive liability on American finances. If the average price of gas changes by a cent that's something like nearly a million dollars difference. This isn't maximizing profit, this is just being petty to own the libs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 week ago (8 children)

More EVs means lower gas prices.

This drives up gas prices.

Killing the tax credit drives up gas prices.

It's quite remarkable how economically m ignorant a large section of America is. Supply and demand is the easiest model to understand and yet these voters have been positioned to work against their own best interest at a basic economic level.

And this is only one a hundreds of examples. Fascinating time to be alive.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

More EVs means lower gas prices.

This drives up gas prices.

I know, it's almost as though the multinational oil corporations and their shareholders who backed all three of Trump's campaigns want higher oil and gas prices for some reason... what could that be?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That part at least makes sense.

It's all the voters with their massive gas guzzling vehicles that are voting against their best interest. Over and over again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The fact is that you're politically engaged and the average voter is not.

They're not dumb or anything, but politics and economics are not things for which they look past their noses. Politics and economics are complex topics and that's why Trump's antics and tactics work so well. He stays in the headlines and gets people feeling like they're part of a team. For a similar example, loads of folks don't pay attention to NFL players, teams, and coaches during the off season... but once games start happening, allegiances are taken. Even if a neighboring or different franchise might have a better chance of winning (thus make you feel like a winner by proxy) you might still just cheer on the team that first caught your attention/is in your geographic area. People don't want a sermon and they definitely don't want to be scolded... they want to be on a winning team regardless of the consequences of that choice (leopards eating faces, etc, etc).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No, thats fuckin’ dumb and people who voted for this are dumb.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Better get my passive aggressive stickers ready

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Dumb take.

Everybody knows the real cause of high gas prices is Joe Biden. Haven't you seen the stickers on the pumps? It says it right there..."I did that", with a picture of Biden's face.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The existing fleet is past aging out, they are often held together with patch welds and duct tape in my area. Is the plan ride it until the wheels literally fall off, with no replacements in pipeline?

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Actually yes. They want to privatize it so that they can make money on it. Failure is the goal.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago

"Failure is the goal" needs to be the subtitle of every news story for the foreseeable future.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Yeah but even if that's the play - could private business even fill the gap? USPS stretches the final miles deep into places not profitable to deliver to. Businesses, doing business stuff, use it to economically have their products available to the rural communities that voted these policies in.. it's all so confusing.

Is mailing a letter automated space communism? Sheesh.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And ironically, it’s the flyover deep red parts of the country that are the most rural, and therefore the most unprofitable legs of these delivery services. As with so many other GOP policies, it would mostly impact their supporters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They don't care if there's gaps, those people just won't get mail service. They're only interested in extracting as much money as they can from the rotting husk of the US economy. They've just hollowed out so much of the middle class now that they're scraping the bottom of the barrel and need to start squeezing the last dregs out of the barely profitable things like the USPS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

No. Not only can it not fill the gap there isn't an intent to.

It's just, sell off a chunk of the government so someone can make money on a service.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Actually yes. They want to privatize it so that they can make money on it. Failure is the goal.

Actually yes. They want to privatize it so that they can ~~make money on it~~ further exploit the working class. Failure is the goal.

Although you're right, I like to call out what it will do to everyone so it's more explicit and will hopefully click in people's minds.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Why is that a question? How else do you plan to privatize one of the most ubiquitous federal services?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The plan is to make it so ineffective it can justifiably be privatized entirely and their friends make millions by jacking up rates on a product that by design and necessity has no direct competitors.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Crippling the USPS with additional fuel costs and shitty low mileage vehicles will work out great I'm sure.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As designed so they can privatize.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not just that. They're going to cripple these services so bad that they don't even function and then blame their ineptitude on this sick remnant of the Democratic past, while they point at the flaws they created as justification.

You won't have a choice. You don't, actually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Don't worry, Elon Musk has a much better idea for a postal vehicle. All he needs is 10 years and 1 trillion dollars and he'll be ready with the prototype.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

And then the prototype will be just the regular robotaxi where he stuffed a bunch of letters on the passender seat. Car is meant go from house to house and then honk untill people come down and pick up their stuff from the seat. Unfortunately, the vehicle only works in movie studios with a pre-programmed route. Those of you not living in a movie studio will have to pick up their stuff at the next Tesla dealer for a small fee of $10.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And his dipshit USPS head is still there waiting for his time to shine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reuters has previously reported that Trump is planning to kill a $7,500 consumer tax credit for electric vehicle purchases

Noooo! My friends just bought EVs and they're gonna be so smug if I don't get the credit!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whatever oil wants, oil gets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

usps should go on strike if this happens

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Keep in mind, this is a new Gilded Age. Trump would most certainly call in the Pinkertons for some good ol' fashioned strike breaking.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Exclusive: Trump does stupid shit. more at 11.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I can't say watching red wisconsin counties get fucked hard by Trump doing the thing everyone expected him to do isn't satisfying

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I remember reading Dante's Inferno for the first time. I'm glad to be reminded of that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I really don't understand why money is so much more important to these people than not fucking over the environment.

But I guess you don't get stinking rich by thinking about anything other than money. The concept of a wider world must really be foreign to these cunts.

Maybe a few more assassins are in order.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

USPS employees love it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I kind of wish someone was keeping track of speculative “news articles” like this and holding them accountable when they don’t come to fruition. There should be some reputational cost for making things up and spreading rumors.

load more comments
view more: next ›