this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
607 points (98.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35422 readers
277 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

My salary didn't change at all, but homes went up 82%. The money I saved for a down payment and my salary no longer are good enough for this home and many others. This ain't even a "good" home either. It was a 200k meh average ok home before. Now it's simply unaffordable

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago

I like the utility feed hanging off the front of the house going straight through the roof and blocking them from installing the other fake shutter. I wonder what other construction horrors lurk inside.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Best hurry ... Ozempic is destroying the caloric benefit

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No rich person is living in a 325k ranch house.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 108 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You just need to stop watching Netflix and buying avocado toast.

At least that's what old people say anyway.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Can confirme. I stopped drinking Starbucks and now I own a 50 acre plot with a 6 bedroom house on it. If only I would have listened to their Facebook comments sooner, I could have afforded that private jet too. Edit: Apparently sarcasm is lost on a few. So for explicitness - /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Assuming you spend $10 on avocado toast every day, as well as $75 on eating out for every meal, $20 for Starbucks, and ALSO assuming you have $150 worth of monthly subscriptions:

It will take you 25 years to save one million dollars. That's assuming you never get sick, never lose a job, never need to buy a car or have major repairs, or basically any kind of surprise expense or setback that could wipe out savings.

To be the richest person on earth, you would need to save that money every year for over 6 MILLION YEARS

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not to devalue your point, but if you truly were spending (10 + 3*75 + 20)*30 + 150 per month (so a total of 7800 USD) and you invest it in an index fund getting back 5%, you'll have your million in 10 years. 8 years at 10% which is the long-term growth rate of DJIA and S&P 500.

You'll still never be the richest person in the world, but if you truly were burning away that much money, you could make decent dough just from investing it passively. In 30 years you'd have like 15 million, more than enough to retire.

Now the only real problem is that nearly nobody is actually burning that much cash and the "stop eating avocado toast" suggestions are indeed stupid af.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not that this is "ok" but it's why "buy whatever you can as soon as you can" is good advice. If you'd put whatever you had into a shitty condo four years ago, and kept saving at the same rate, you'd likely be in good position to trade up soon.

I see a lot of people I know end up in the same position because they've been waiting for either the exact right circumstances or for prices to "crash." All the people i know who started with anything they could afford now have a huge amount of equity in nice homes. The difference is real and primarily about timing more than income or location.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I bought 5 years ago when it was still reasonable. I have a great rate on a great house that has increased by about 50% since I bought it.

I don't want to, because this is just about the perfect size house for us in a great location, but I can't really "trade up" as the interest rates are through the roof and everything is more expensive too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I think you misunderstand. He didn't have the financial wherewithal to acquire a home of any sort because a down payment was expected even of the shitty condo. He didn't have the money then he doesn't have the money now he's on the same shitty treadmill that the rest of us in the permanent underclass are.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A lot of boomers are going to die in the next ten years or so. That is the biggest age demographic in the u.s. the population is going to shrink by a lot. That's why there's a push to make people have more kids, because otherwise workers and consumers have a lot more power.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Private equity is already gobbling up the houses. Boomers are cashing in to finance extravagant retirement. Those who are not, are leaving it to their children who will then sell to private equity groups.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is everywhere. I've been looking for houses for 3 months in NW Ohio. 300k is the new 150k, and all the houses are beat to shit on the inside needing 50k just to make them passable inside because nobody takes care of them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I wonder what proportion of it is also due to people fleeing 1 million + average house markets during the pandemic work from home wave. Not saying this about you, but it makes me think it's funny how the common refrain of "Don't like it? Just move" is often uttered by NIMBYs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

A house in Austin

2018: $275,000
2022: $725,000

Those are actual numbers from East Austin. I believe the 2024 market rate is $625,000 but it hasn't changed hands again so I can't say for certain.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Is this one of the areas where corps are buying up a shitload of real estate?

[–] [email protected] 146 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I believe it's on earth, yes.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

My moon base is not gaining ANY land value....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Tbh this is more than mildly infuriating...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is because venture capitalists are buying all the homes to rent

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So occasionally I look out of curiosity and the reason is pretty plain.

I look for houses for sale in a suburban area as public listings, and there's like 1 within a few square miles of the area.

I switch over to renting, and there's like 12 houses just like the one for sale available, all owned by companies. I also know a coule that aren't listed that have no tenants, but are still owned by one of those companies. You can tell because those yards are now waist deep grasses (in an area where HOA throws a hissy fit if your yard looks just a smidge unkempt).

Don't know why the companies find it more profitable to buy houses people aren't looking to actually move into, at least at the rent they are willing to accept. If I fully understood why, it might just piss me off more. Like maybe the houses work better as a loan basis than other assets, so even empty and unused they are valuable as some sort of financial trick.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Don’t know why the companies find it more profitable to buy houses people aren’t looking to actually move into, at least at the rent they are willing to accept. If I fully understood why, it might just piss me off more. Like maybe the houses work better as a loan basis than other assets, so even empty and unused they are valuable as some sort of financial trick.

That's one thing, but housing has been a low-risk investment for a long, long time. If they bought the house OP posted in 2020 and sold it in 2024 they would have almost doubled their money even without renting it out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

This won't change as long as property ownership and property renting is unified. There's just to much of a business incentive from renting, even if it takes decades to make it back. Worst that can happen is that it can sell it back to a market that criminalizes homelessness instead of treating it or its causes.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago (7 children)

My lucky ass bought a house in late 2019. I'm happy I'm making money on it but this doesn't seem healthy

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (6 children)

You're only making money if you downsize, move somewhere cheaper, or switch back to renting. If you move and all the other houses have gone up, then you just end up having to sink any gained equity into affording your new place. Rising prices really only help developers, realtors, and REIT's.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (7 children)

A 1200 sqft bungalow near me just sold for 1 million Canadian rubles

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It’s the same in Kansas City. I just checked a random house in my city and it’s up almost $100k in 4 years.

3bd, 1bath 976 sqft

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Yep, that's on track! My house has almost tripled in price since I bought it 12 years ago. Denver metro. No way I could afford it if I had to buy it today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

In my area, it's a 100-150% increase in four years.

It doesn't sound like much until you see numbers.

A $350k house is now $700k for no reason.

A $400k house is now a million.

It's depressing.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

Being able to buy a $200,000 house in the town I live in would change my life so much.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

82%, feel lucky. I bought my house in 2015 for $85k. Last assessment was almost $300k

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

That's cheap as hell compared to California. And I work remote from anywhere I want. Thanks for the tip!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that 4 years ago was COVID times when everything was shit.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

House prices exploded during Covid. Yeah, they dipped for like 2 weeks initially, but then they skyrocketed.

load more comments
view more: next ›