this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
867 points (97.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5575 readers
3026 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Any Accountability At All Commission

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I remember hoping that Obama would prosecute Bush for all of his crimes, in hindsight it was really naive.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

We JuSt NeEd To MoVe On AnD hEal As A nAtIoN!

.... /Vomit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 39 minutes ago (3 children)

Bush was mostly lawful evil. Trump is just a Captain Planet villain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 minutes ago (1 children)

Trump is just a Captain Planet villain cosplayer.

FTFY.

Trump is simply not competent enough and never has been.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 minutes ago

He's the fanfic child of Hoggish Greedly and Looten Plunder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 minutes ago

Bush wasn’t evil. He was a good man but in over his head. His entire cabinet was evil men that knew exactly what they were doing and they largely called all the shots

[–] [email protected] 3 points 36 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

Is lying about "weapons of mass destruction" in order to convince the country to invade another so the dickbag trio could get more wealthy legal? Cheney, Rumsfield and Bush agree I guess.

Free speech and all would make lying legal, so I guess you're right... Lawful evil it is then :/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Right? I hate that phrase as it's used here. How are we supposed to move on when national traumas are left unresolved?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

The third political party in the US should be The Woodchipper. You don't vote for candidates, just The Woodchipper. If The Woodchipper gets the majority of votes, all the candidates on the ticket get tossed in a fucking woodchipper and we start the election over with new candidates.

This fixes our problems, in a uniquely American way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 49 minutes ago

Televise this, just as Carlin intended.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 38 minutes ago

This is, indeed, a more realistic solution for America than, let's say, let the president have less power. Or getting rid of the electoral college.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Who gets to throw them in?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

They're still bitter about Groundhog Day. I say, let them have it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

I don't want Trump to win because he's more likely to create a "presidential crimes commission" full of political appointees going after the other party.

We have the legal system, if there are crimes they should be charged. The answer is not some additional political tribunal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 27 minutes ago (1 children)

Judge shopping and legislation via court ruling have called into question the fairness and legitimacy of a once ironclad judicial system. It's being gamed right now by the wealthy and powerful to get what they want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 minutes ago

Then the answer is fixing those issues. Saying the system isn't working so we need to ignore it and build out a new system purpose built to prosecute my political opponents is like definitional fascism. We don't need a strong man to fix everything extrajudicially, we just need the law applied fairly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago

We have the legal system

I mean...do we?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ha ha ha ha your legal system is the laughing stock of the planet

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

glances at Europe

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago

Creating a Department dedicated entirely to Justice.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

If we can't even get Trump to stop running despite being a convicted felon, I don't even know if we can catch up with the next fucker. Dude could literally shoot someone on 5th Ave and the government would go "Well, they're the president, what are you going to do about it?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Having convicted felon be able to run for office is a good thing. I don't want a Navalny situation in my country.

An insurrectionist, though? Fuck that noise. Trump should be hanged. He tried to violently overthrow the government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't he directly say he could shoot someone and still win the (2016) election? I swear I remember seeing that he flat out said that, I think around the time of the Republican primary debates

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

Haha yeah the government that’s currently enabling war crimes is gonna totally make a commission to hold presidents liable for crimes.

This is why nothing changes. If you start looking at one of them you have to look at all of them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

organize and take to the streets (and their pockets) if you want that to actually happen.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Impeachment exists, if only there were a functioning body of government left to do such a thing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I will believe Impeachment means something once someone is removed from power until then it's a political threat that means nothing.

At this point it's an untested power.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago

Arguably, it has been tested, several times. Each time it failed, after a fashion. We should be concerned what message that sends to the next person who would contemplate engaging in such impeachment-actionable behaviors.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Why stop there? Have every President, Senator, and Member of Congress investigated at all times. Whether we think they’re corrupt or not.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe a stupid question, but shouldn't the FBI be doing that?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They should, but don't, and haven't ever. At this point I don't really trust them to.

Especially given their pinkerton start.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

The same FBI that was dismissed by Trump when they looked into him, even though he was totally guilty? Or the same FBI that told civil rights protestors to kill themselves?

The FBI is the Federal police for crimes the common man commits, not the rich.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 18 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›