A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
I wish the article went into some detail about how the hell a 72-year-old fought in a war. I know people can be in good shape at that age, but I wouldn't think they'd be in voluntarily joining a war shape.
Also, how did he end up in the custody of Russia? Captured, or just strolled into Moscow one day with his big balls clanging at each step.
I'm also curious why he isn't being treated as a POW. This seems like a violation of the Geneva convention, but there's too little information here.
Russia is a fascist state and doesn't care about that, or hypocrisy.
That's your missing information.
*Prisoner of special military operation
Article doesn't say, but I'm assuming they captured him in Ukraine. In which case Russia took someone from a foreign territory they were at war with (they've done this so much already that we know it happens) as a prisoner of war. And then sentenced him in one of their internal kangaroo courts.
I'm not a lawyer, but it sounds like they broke a plethora of Geneva Convention provisions. (Again, something we know Russia does a lot.)
Nitpick: From Russia's point of view Ukraine isn't a foreign territory, this is a civil war.
I don't get it. Unless there are warcrimes involved, condemning enemy combatants is more than petty. Especially if they are captured outside Russian territory.
I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with anything beyond Russia wanting to use him as a bargaining chip
Just as the horny dude that went from his crayon eating routine to freaking russia cause a girl asked him to and got jailed because of being an american: russia needs prisioners to trade. Don't fly to russia if you hold a NATO-member citizenship
Big assumption he was actually a combatant. The Kremlin sat on this for two years then had a closed trial. I wouldn't even believe them if they told me what they had for lunch, let alone this.
Early on Russia said it would treat any foreigner fighting for Ukraine as a mercenary, and criminally punish them. Doesn't matter that they sign with the Ukrainian government to fully be in the Ukrainian military. Just more rank hypocrisy, as they pull soldiers from all over Africa, India and China. Along with Americans caught in statutory rape charges that happened to flee before trial.
Fuck, we need to give him a medal, that is a badass right there.
If he was, that is none of putin's business.
Just be honest and say they sentenced him to death. Whether it's from abuse or just because at his age he won't last 7 years in their shitty prisons, he's never going home and everybody knows it.
They should offer to send him to the front lines in lieu of prison and see how that works out for them.