this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
276 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3659 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So, not only is he ignorant to what "AI" is, he's thinking everyone else is as well? 🤣🤡

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 111 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not going to get into the minutia of how someone manufactured this

No, baby, you're gonna have to get into it. This is not a deepfake image, this is your posting history. We can see the whole record of it. If someone manufactured the evidence, they've been planning it for decades.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah. It's not like someone thought, in 2008, that this particular black guy guy would eventually be running for governor as the major party candidate on a platform based on bigotry and re-electing a convicted criminal as President.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Mr. Robinson, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fuck his soul. He deserves zero mercy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a line from the movie Billy Madison.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Which I quoted this just today!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean that's why Trump likes the guy, for now

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Someone put shit in my pants!”

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Ted Nugent is that you?

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the other half of the problem with deep fakes.

People can fake awful shit, sure, and be convincing. The other half is that people can pass awful shit off as being fake.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sure, but this wasn't an image of TSwift with a MAGA 2024 shirt on that was AI generated.

This is years, over a decade, of post histories tied to his IP address with his own profile picture on these sites that was registered a long, long time ago.

Speaking as someone who works heavily with AI in the Software Engineering community, there's no way today to get AI to do this.

Definitely no way to fake the server logs across multiple groups as well as the IP access logs.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Exactly. He’s passing his awful shit off as fake.

Or trying to, anyway. Not saying he’s competent. Just awful,

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Nevermind that concocting some of these screenshots would be so easily done with basic HTML that without backing proof they'd mean nothing.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

How can you accuse Weird Al like that?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

It could be Alcohol Induced.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kaczynski asked for clarification about how Robinson believed Stein embedded comments published over a five-year period from 2008 to 2013.

Was it a time travelling AI? Generative AI wasn't much of a thing in 2008-2013.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That damn T-1000 looking for John Connor just couldn't help himself.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

This is waaaaay better than what I thought he did lol

I thought he flat out ate a baby, not post 7 years worth of horrible racist, antisemitic, sexist, I'm a nazi shit on a black porn site.

At least I HOPE he didn't eat a baby. Hes fucked up enough to do it

All I have to say is: STAY IN THE RACE, MARK! You show those white nationalists that a black nazi never gives up!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Sure bro. Suuuuuure.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Can't wait for the leopard to eat this one.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah. YOU manufactured it. Dumbass.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The sad thing is this might be one of the last times in history that you CAN'T claim this. In 4 years, posting info might be so drowned out by AI garbage that you won't be able to tell what is real and what is AI using user names from other sites and making racist posts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

A few years ago: It was Cryptocurrency and NFTs!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I can call you Nutty, and Nutty when you post shit, blame it all on Al

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/mark-robinson-gop-candidate/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support