this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
202 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59187 readers
2182 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like it's still a solar cell though, they just figured out how to make it thinner and flexible. By the time you stack them into a cell, is there really any difference?

"By stacking multiple light-absorbing layers into one solar cell (known as a multi-junction approach), a wider range of the light spectrum is harnessed, allowing more power to be generated from the same amount of sunlight.

This thin-film perovskite material has been independently certified by Japan’s National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) to deliver over 27% energy efficiency. It matches the performance of traditional, single-layer silicon PV for the first time."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you can lay flexible material directly onto the roof, perhaps it can just be the roof, replacing traditional shingles.

It'll be expensive at first until it's in wide production, assuming it gets that far without a big flaw being found.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Like Tesla's solar roof? Those replace shingles as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is always a catch.

in this case I'll bet its the price

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Or a brand new set of DNA altering forever chemicals.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Does that mean we'll all become the Flash?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I’m guessing it’s more likely to be “the Flesh”.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Another perovskite hype piece. You'll know that they've got something that's commercially viable once they're making these sorts of efficiency claims and not omitting information about cell degradation.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

From the article:

Oxford PV, a UK company spun out of Oxford University Physics in 2010 by Snaith to commercialize perovskite photovoltaics, recently started large-scale manufacturing of perovskite photovoltaics at its factory in Brandenburg-an-der-Havel, near Berlin, Germany. It’s the world’s first volume manufacturing line for “perovskite-on-silicon” tandem solar cells.

https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00096B

By adapting the formulation and synthesis of the perovskite and the cell design and encapsulation optimization, Oxford PV succeeded in mitigating stability-related deficits and aims at providing future buyers of their modules with the industry-standard 25 year performance guarantee

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Oxford PV this year no?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We could generate solar power before we even had solar panels. You just used the sun to heat up water. Solar panels made solar power generation more effective.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah, that's just solar collection.

The generation you're talking about happens in the star.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Well, that's older than water!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

This will bring new meaning to the idea of a burner bag.