this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
9 points (90.9% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3733 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Even though this would be a win for all Americans – and humanity – it apparently did not outweigh the politics of making a Democrat look good. This is the definition of party over country.

I'm a doctor.So is my mother. When she got cancer, I realized how little that mattered.

Republicans have stated budget cuts need to be made with an ever-growing debt. But where was this attitude when tax cuts for the wealthy were on the table in 2017? They don’t have to look at patients in the eye and break the devastating news that they have cancer. They don’t have to treat cancers that block intestines or drown a patient’s lungs in fluid.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

reminds me of when trump disbanded the government's pandemic response team ~~for no other reason than obama created it.~~ and then covid happened...

edit: pandemic response team was created by bush, then expanded by obama.

trump gutted it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Or Bush/Cheney got rid of experts on Al-Qaeda and bin Laden upon taking over the office because of whatever reasons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

GOP is completely irrational and hostile. They’re dragging us to hell with them. Assholes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Americans, where the fuck did you stray off the beaten path? I hate this timeline

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Harris needs to shout this from the rooftops

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep, can't get a better line than: "Republicans voted against curing cancer!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People still voting Republican absolutely don't give a fuck. Cruelty is the point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I think they just might, though. There's a unifying experience with cancer that transcends party lines. Not a single person in this country has not been affected themselves or know someone affected by cancer.

Democrats really need to drive this point home. They need to make this personal for every voter, not partisan. Blatantly say that cancer doesn't give a fuck if you're Republican, Democrat, wealthy, or poor. Or can come for anyone, even those that have spent their life trying to live healthily.

What they've done it's akin to an alien invasion movie where instead of defending the planet, Congress decides to do nothing because it might give someone they don't like a political win. It baffles my mind how inhumane Republicans and the mega wealthy are.

Honestly, if tRump was president and there was a chance to cure cancer for good, I'd be 100% fine giving him that win. I'd send him a personal fucking thank you letter.

Fuck cancer and fuck Republicans!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Republicans have a lot of blood on their hands and we should stop treating them as reasonable adults.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We said that in 1992 and 2000, and 2004, and 2008, and 2020, and

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

2012 too, man. Congress shut down the government under Obama because "fuck you, that's why!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The secret reason was racism

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

From now on, anyone who loses someone to cancer will not have to wonder what happened or how it could have been prevented. Death to cancer no longer has anonymity. The mask will forever be removed. We can now lay future loses and pain due to this horrible fate at the feet of Republicans and their partisan horseshit.

Fuck, I hate those fuckers, now as much as I hate cancer!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Since they've aligned themselves with cancer, I submit that transitive property is a thing. Ergo, they now are cancer.

And you know what we do to cancer, right kids? Fire, lasers, poison and radiation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Need to be putting this on billboards in red states. Let everybody who has lost family or has family battling cancer know what they have done.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Need to be putting this on billboards in red states.

"The GOP just protected you from another vaccine"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not this time. Cancer isn't communicative and there is no one alive who has not known someone battling or lost from cancer. It's not a personal failing of the individual and it doesn't give a shit who you are or how you live. It just might be the first time that a Republican voter could tangibly see how the wealthy and Republicans look to keep them dead, rather than do something nonpartisan.

Fuck a "win for Joe." They just blocked a win for humanity. We all know that in the end, you bet your ass the wealthy will have no problem getting their hands on this no matter the price or extremes they have to go to as soon as they are personally affected.

Seriously, buy ads on every type of public media display possible. It could read:

F#k a win for Joe!* Republicans in Congress just voted to let you and anyone you love die in the name of letting you and anyone you care about die from cancer!

Call your local representative and demand they put their partisanship aside, because I'm sick of seeing good people lose their lives to something that we now have the power to stop for the benefit of all of humanity!

I don't know. Maybe throw out shit about how even beloved pets get cancer and die even sooner than we expect because of this shit. Maybe show a picture of a sickly dog shining down from a glowing halo. I'm just spit-balling here. You all get it!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Cancer isn’t communicative

No, but it IS environmental. And we've been flooding our air, sea, and soil with toxic waste for decades.

That makes us a Hippie Green Issue, so Republicans oppose it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The GOP should be banned by decree and being conservative should be illegal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That would not be democratic. It would be the exact same thing the GOP wants to do. Left branded totalitarianism would still be totalitarianism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Between left-branded totalitarianism and GOP I choose left-branded totalitarianism. An eye for an eye.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. When we fully fund holistic health care, that's a win. Piecemeal isn't a solution, and keeps people in desperation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If this cure involved animal testing then good it was blocked. Stop all animal testing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It doesn't seem like this program has anything to do with "curing" cancer. It's just about preventing, treating, and researching. It doesn't explicity mention animal testing on the whitehouse.gov page. I'd say its a program with good goals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Look, you either kill rats or kill people. I love animals, it's unfortunate we need to experiment on them, but it's also naive to think we can make progress without doing it. At best one could make an argument for death row inmates to be experimented on, but that would be quickly shut down as unethical and there wouldn't be enough anyway. There is no way around animal testing, we can only keep it to a minimum.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Unless you're spending all your money on cancer research, you can always spend more on it. At some point, you have to draw a line and someone will accuse you of deliberately refusing to cure cancer no matter where you draw that line. It's plausible to me that the line should be where the Democrats rather than the Republicans want it, and it's even plausible that Republicans are acting in bad faith. However, this article presents no evidence for either claim.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

At some point, you have to draw a line and someone will accuse you of deliberately refusing to cure cancer no matter where you draw that line.

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the $1T we spend on national security annually. Somehow, we're always able to justify more than the year before.

But $2.8B over ten years on an effort to improve health care treatments for one of the most deadly maladies in the US? My god! That's over 3% of our Ukraine military aid budget! We need to draw a line somewhere!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think that's a pretty reasonable response. Maybe not so much that cancer in general is over funded but I'd be willing to bet a breast cancer cure probably isn't any closer now than it would be with another billion. It's definitely a bad look for the GOP though. I see a lot of We the people... bs bumper stickers with the f*** cancer! stickers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Spending one billion on breast cancer drug discovery/ development would probably lead to one more drug which increases survival by 10-20%. Or if spend on fundamental research it would lead to a lot of additional knowledge. Which might lead in about 10 years (and a few billions more) to a few drugs which increase survival a further 30-40 %.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why an American went to Cuba for cancer care

Cuba has faced more than 50 years of US sanctions. Now, for the first time, a unique drug developed on the communist island is being tested in New York state. But some American cancer patients are already taking it - by defying the embargo and flying to Havana for treatment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Really shows how ass backwards the US really is.

Cuba, a country that the US has tried to destroy for over 60 years now with economic sanctions, has better healthcare than the US, aka the richest nation on the planet.

There is no excuse for the state of healthcare in the US. We really have some evil, greedy people deciding to let people die so they can have more money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Also Cuba didn't really do anything? They only truly alligned themselves with the communist block after the united states decided to start being shitty to them out of nothing but paranoia. Classic tyrant looking everywhere for conspiracies and causing some to appear moment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cuba has three sides of the coin: one for foreigners, another for citizens and finally for politicians.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Cuba has three sides of the coin

What?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Do you think Big Pharma wants a cure for cancer? Me neither. That might be the real reason it was voted down.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

Why can't DEMOCRATS reach across the Aisle to Deliver for the American People?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

There are many cancers. And many cancers already have cure. And many don't.

with an ever-growing debt

Let's be real here: American debt is so big, that it holds entire world economy hostage.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

was it the 117th cure to be funded?