this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
756 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 194 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I just noticed that I like posts with "X ordered to do..." sooo much better than posts with "Elon says..."

[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I prefer the latter, because it's so much easier to filter out posts about Elon than it is to filter out posts about X (without creating a ton of false positives).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

exactly this. i have a filter on certain keywords. his name is in there but there's nothing I can do to avoid posts about the platform.

it's super irritating.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Plan? Sure. Cunning? Eh....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Does your filter recognize whitespace? Including a space before and/or after X should catch the posts about the platform while not filtering out posts that just have an X inside a word somewhere. X isn't going to be a single letter surrounded by space unless it's referring to the platform.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 131 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Surprise, Space Karen, places other than the US have actual employee protection laws.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm always baffled how US slavers fall for that trap again and again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The US doesn't fall for anything; the pols are paid to not work for the people. It's greed, not idiocy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

How is it not idiocy to get burned by european labour laws time and time again? Greed makes stupid.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

but laws don't apply to billionaires 😭 /s

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well it's not like Musk was fined, the company has to pay.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Since he's the sole owner it's pretty much the same, it's profits (hahahaha) that's not going in his pockets.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I thought Sauia Arabia put up a shed load of cash as well ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 3 months ago (4 children)

you know what I always stan for? "former Twitter". I just love that shit! I hope it always stays like this to show that the rebranding didn'T work

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I've been thinking we need to get aspirational and take it to the next level:

Instead of "X (formally know as Twitter)", the time has come for "Twitter (currently called X)".

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't even acknowledge the current name of the site, just keep calling it Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Trending on Occupied Twitter"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It's just a special capitalist operation!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

just call it twitter. literally everyone knows what it is, and twitter.com still redirects there so who gives a shit what he's calling it. don't show his site the courtesy he doesn't show to his own daughter.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

He literally still called the posts tweets so....

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I'm just sad we aren't at calling it "formerly facebook" instead of meta

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not a fan of the company, but at least this one has a handful of different platforms underneath it - Oculus, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Facebook. Having Facebook the product and Facebook the overarching company kind of ads a little complication.

I don't quite feel the same way about Alphabet/Google, but at least that's more subtle.

X can fuck the duck right off.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, same as Alphabet. Neither of these renamed their key product either. Just put a new company on top.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I still call it Facebook. Meta is equally stupid as X. Meta as a word already existed in multiple different ways. Now if you say 'that's meta' you have to stop and think, which may be why I've seen that phrase really die out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The meta rebranding is not as evil as the hostile takeover of Twitter. So I am inclined to accept that name change but I do not know really what using meta means.

I don't use FB, if I did I would still say FB. I use WhatsApp and I don't call that meta. I guess the individual products just keep their names here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There is also the difference that Facebook the service is still called Facebook. Only the company name changed, but not the product name. Where for Twitter, he renamed both the product and the company.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

X is simply too vague.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 3 months ago (4 children)

This employee in question was an executive

[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it’s worth noting that the employee in this case had the resources to fight. Hopefully other regular non-executive employees can use it as precedent for their own lawsuits.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not sure how different it is in Ireland, but here in Australia you’d have spoken to the fair work ombudsman and they’d go and “fight” this for you.

Seeing as the article says “Ireland’s Workplace Relations Commission” handled this, kinda sounds like a similar situation rather than wealth having anything to do with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ex X executive is fun to say out loud.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

XXX-kyootive

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Of course. Not like they'd order the same for the custodian or whatever. But because they are of high status they get protected.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Otherwise he would have gotten 1 figure less, and then we would never have heard about him.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 3 months ago

It was more fun watching this loser lose before I realized it’s all they really do.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Shame it wasn't a class action suit. $600k is peanuts compared to $600k per violation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

my exact thoughts, every single employee who received this email should have sued his ass. You are only required to work as much as your contract details and this a clear instance of workplace bullying

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago

This is why I never read my emails.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Now that they won - the effort to collect what they won can start…!

load more comments
view more: next ›