Just a small way to help people get their FOSS. What are some other projects that have torrents that would be good to seed?
Anna's Archive can always use help
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
23 points (92.6% liked)
Linux
48044 readers
783 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Is it legal? There may be alternatives with plausible deniability.
Don't know, I'm not up on copyright law.
Not FOSS, but a library/archive: https://annas-archive.org/torrents
Popular Linux ISOs are usually mirrored across a lot of mirrors (duh), so availability is already very good.
At 16kb/s per connection , I think you have to ask yourself if you’re really helping. Have you checked your settings that you aren’t limiting your upload speeds?
Edit: people seem to be offended by this comment, so let me clarify by what I meant with “are you really helping”.
Torrent clients default to a fixed number of peers they download from. If you end up with only 16kb/s connections, you are being limited by those seeders in how fast you can download.
Whereas if there were less seeders but they could provide 1mb/s connections, you are limited by your own internet connection and are downloading full blast.
I hope that clarifies my statement.
I'd rather have a 16kb/s seeder than a dead torrent
For real. I’m slowly downloading a documentary from one person right now, it’s been a few weeks and it’ll be a few more, but I thank them for it
I have had torrents that ran at extremely low speeds and also intermittently were offline because the seeder ran a colossal seedbox but rotated “inventory” to be able to seed more than just what they could handle at once. So it was rotating content. I downloaded something for almost three months I think. But eventually I got it all. Funny thing was I seeded it for the next like 6 months to help, but literally nobody ever connected, so I felt very fortunate that being apparently the only person who seemed to want the thing, I had found a seeder.
If it makes you feel any better, I had a torrent that took about a week to download. 12 months later my ratio is 139 or something. I like to think I resurrected it with the help of that one lone seeder.
How do you find seeders of rare content?
Well, occasionally I’ll just be lucky enough I’ll try a result on a tracker that says 0 seeds. I try those all the time if I really can’t find a torrent with seeds. Lots of the ones that are seemingly dead, will kick up again at some point. I’ve had a lot of luck with even dead seeds from results on magnetdl.com and bitsearch.to but the latter you really want to have adblocks because they load a dozen of those shitty vpn ads every minute and they’re new window pop ups. Without Adblock I’d never even visit that site. But they have an excellent catalogue so I do use them. Magnetdl used to be my goto but lately they’ve had all kinds of weird cloudflare errors. Cloudflare sucks.
But aside from that and if someone seeds something upon request it’s just blind luck. But my main point I guess would be don’t shy away from links with 0 seeds indicated.
same boat, what documentary?
Under an Arctic Sky. It’s about surfers going to Iceland to.. surf, I assume
use video downloaderhelper or internet download manager and rip it. this one is 720p, but if you find it on another site, should be able to rip it in 1080p at least.
here it is in 1080p - https://www.redbull.com/us-en/films/under-an-arctic-sky
i'm also adding this link to my seeds once it finishes - magnet:?xt=urn:btih:4e578d0794506d804554b409c5c71db8e3cb48ee
Thank you so much for that! I’ve been out of the country for a week, will take a look at what’s going on when I get home :)
Torrent clients are usually smart enough to decide what the best seeders are to get the best possible availability and throughput.
OP seeding at 16 KB/s to some peers might also just mean that the leecher's bandwidth is mostly saturated by other peers so they don't need that much bandwidth from OP.
At 16kb/s per connection , I think you have to ask yourself if you’re really helping
That's a rather toxic mentality to have. Any amount of help is always appreciated.
This feels like you don't really understand how the BitTorrent protocol works at all. When you watch Netflix, or download proprietary software (for example Steam) you are connected through a CDN to the geographically closest node. That's one of the main reasons it can be so fast.
However, torrent files aren't distributed by geographic region, the pool of peers is spread out across the globe. So if someone is on the other side of the earth, your upload speed to them is going to be quite small.
You're suggesting OP stop seeding because those seeders will be able to download faster, but we literally see just a snapshot. There could be leechers local to OP that come online and have a close, fast seed.
I'm generally seeding at 50-100kB/s, and when I check those connections they're almost always overseas (qBittorrent resolves the IPs and adds country flags). However, when another Aussie (or a Kiwi, sometimes Indonesians too) leecher connects, it'll often blow past my (ISPs) 50Mbps upload cap to 160-200Mbps or 20-25MB/s. Are you saying I shouldn't seed because that way an American or European will be able to download faster? Even though it's been pointed out to you that it doesn't even work that way. The BitTorrent protocol was designed from the start to mitigate this by prioritisation of peers on the clientside.
I can't believe such a toxic and inaccurate comment has this many upvotes.
You're suggesting OP stop seeding because those seeders will be able to download faster, but we literally see just a snapshot.
I suggested that OP check their settings.
Are you saying I shouldn't seed because that way an American or European will be able to download faster?
Again, that’s not what I am saying at all. Stop putting words in my mouth.
I can't believe such a toxic and inaccurate comment has this many upvotes.
If you’re looking for a toxic comment, look at your own where you are wilfully misrepresenting my argument, make wild assumptions and then attack those. That's textbook definition of toxic behavior.
Don’t most clients switch to seeders that deliver faster? Over time, I mean?
I'm seeding this 24/7. Feel free to join in.
Patriot Front Fascist Leak Exposes Nationwide Racist Campaigns
https://vault.unicornriot.ninja/patriotfrontleaks/patriotfront-repack.torrent
new House of the Dragon episodes
Based
EndeavourOS
Added
Does anybody download iso's via torrents? Or how to help the actual sites that serve these? Since I trust the source more than torrents.. Especially for an image..
Verifiying the checksum of an iso takes 30 seconds... You don't need to trust anyone
Been on Linux 6 years, never done it. Extra steps
Length of time never means quality of decisions. Always best to validate. So easy to package up malware and farm folks bank accounts.
Hence my threat model hasn't included torrents.
You grab the .torrent file from the source website (Mint, in this case) and it's safe
Ahh makes sense. I still direct download but I guess if I had Torrent client locally it might be nice. But 3-4GiB on direct download doesn't take long..
It's more of a way to reduce costs for the CDN, using torrents everyone contributes and they only have to send a small magnet file.
It doesn't, but thousands of people all downloading 3-4GB from the same site will put more load on the site. Torrents avoid this issue by downloading little bits from lots of different peers
I prefer to download isos via torrents. You can easily check the checksum and signature once it's downloaded. And you're getting the torrent/magnet link/etc from the source so it's not some random torrent from piratebay or something lmao
Why not direct download from website?
Avoid detracting from the hosts bandwidth quota.
Can be faster than downloading from a centralised server that everyone is trying to download from. But mostly just habit.
I think it saves them costs but idk shit about servers
Wikipedia torrents from kiwix
netbsd.org will love that
The Rotating Food Gifs Collection 1-5
You're not seeding properly, check your upload settings or try qBittorrent.
OP has acceptable seed ratio on the files near the bottom.