this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
287 points (88.1% liked)

Political Memes

5409 readers
4881 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Conservatives joke that progressives just blow with the wind from one controversy to the next. But I can't help but notice the anti-Biden "left" shifted hard from Genocide Joe to Bad debate Performance without skipping a beat or looking back.

Almost like the people stoking these fires don't really care about left issues at all.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 4 months ago (7 children)

russian troll farms be out here like

“no we’re innocent socialists!” “democrats aren’t progressive enough and therefore must be defeated” “you can’t accuse me of parroting russian disinformation talking points just because I’m using the same words and arguments”

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 4 months ago (16 children)

Accelerationism is a position that is literally only possible to hold from a position of privilege.

I'm sure crashing through the decline into fascism looks like a great idea when you know you're high enough on the kill list to avoid the actual consequences of fascism happening.

The white left never saw us as allies, only as fodder.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m not sure of the term for this, but I’ll call it “billionaire blindness”. Not blindness to billionaires but a blindness that affects billionaires. And it works like this: because they overestimate their own abilities – their ego cannot handle the large part that luck played in their success – they correspondingly underestimate the abilities of their lackeys.

In this particular context, they vastly underestimate their political pawns. They fail to realize that once Trump and Taylor-Green and cohorts gain dictatorial powers, then those former lackeys will become the masters. To quote Jello Biafra, “In the real fourth reich you’ll be the first to go.” I don’t know what we’ll call it tho. “Night of Long Knives” is too poetic.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Night of the faces getting eaten

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Accelerationism is a position that is literally only possible to hold from a position of privilege.

And boy do they get butthurt when you tell them that they're privileged.

I got one person really indignant with me when I called them privileged because they were pushing accelerationist bullshit about Palestinians being genocides because they didn't have to deal with the results of their rhetoric.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (40 children)

I think it's funny that people think you can just change nominees at this point and still have a chance at winning the contest.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Would you mind elaborating on this? Polls don't favor Biden right now and obviously his debate performance was really REALLY bad. I mean, if he's the nominee, you gotta vote for him, but I'm curious why you think it's so crazy that a person would feel like another Democratic nominee has a better shot. Especially considering how dissatisfied almost everyone in the country is regarding the two choices we have before us, and how often the explanation of that dissatisfaction ends up being because of age.

I think it's a pretty reasonable take to want someone other than Biden to run, considering those things I mentioned. Even if you personally think another candidate besides Biden kills the chances of us beating Trump, why do you think it's so absurd of a position to want someone to take Bidens place?

It seems right now your position, that Biden is the only chance we have against Trump, is the one that is kinda illogical, but I'm curious what your take on that is because there's a chance I'm not accounting for something big, like the logistics of getting a replacement candidate in there and publicized.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Because Biden is currently doing a good job as president and the poll you linked show Trump and Biden polling within 1.5% of each other.

Why would you decide to try something never done before and switch up nominees four month before the election?

That's the position that seems illogical and almost wanting Trump to win.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Humanity fools itself into believing a lot of unbelievable things. Like there’s a man in the skies causing virgin births turning water into wine like a stage magician. It’s Harry Potter with genocide all the way down.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I consider anyone pushing anyone over Biden as part of the Trump campaign. This is a two party system. Creating indecisiveness like this is a very viable and practical subversion tactic and with Trump's Kremlin backers as the Russian candidate as Putin's puppet, anyone that fails to recognise this ploy is being foolish and falling for their nonsense. The Platonic sophism tactic is hard for the simple minded to see through. Unplug from the news cycle and think for yourself outside of the sophist spin doctor nonsense. Ask your own questions and seek out those answers without distraction and exercise skepticism about all sources. If your general media leads your thoughts, you have no real thoughts of your own.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

100% on point. The pivot from “Genocide Joe” to “Anyone/Anything Else Now That Names Are Already On Ballots” is very telling. Also on this list are all the “leftists” pointing fingers at other “leftists” instead of the fascists and centrists.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Almost like the people stoking these fires don't really care about left issues at all.

It’s pretty easy to prove that many of them don’t.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (11 children)

Accelerationists would be encouraging people to plow ahead with Biden so trump wins...

Not trying to maximize chances to beat trump while there's still time before the candidate is named.

trump is a huge threat to American democracy, and I dont see any other reason why so many people insist on a sub optimum candidate except they don't care if trump wins.

It might be different if Biden didn't have a 37% approval rating or a 56% disapproval rating.

But people just don't like Biden, for various reasons he's just not popular with voters. That's why people bring up multiple reasons why Biden isn't a good candidate, there's just a lot of them. And added together they might let trump win like he did in 2016

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Aren’t you making the same mistake you criticize here?

This issue is contentious because we’re all scared of Trump and we all know he has a real chance of winning. And the reality is we genuinely don’t know for sure which strategy can defeat him. People who don’t like Biden respond to this fear by calling for Biden to step down, because they genuinely think someone else would have a better shot. People who like Biden are doubling down because they’re afraid of a contentious replacement process or an untested candidate falling flat and they genuinely think Biden is the best option in this context.

But I don’t think there’s any reason to believe any of this stems from a place other than genuine concern for American democracy. Assuming ill intent just creates pointless anger among the left coalition and doesn’t get us any closer to actually defeating Trump.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

People who like Biden are doubling down because they’re afraid of a contentious replacement process or an untested candidate falling flat and they genuinely think Biden is the best option in this context.

I don't particularly care for Biden. He's better than I expected, but certainly not ideal. He's still pretty clearly the best option this election. Certainly not the best choice to run the country, but once you account for odds of success, there's really not a viable alternative

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, yeah, we've heard you regurgitate the same anti biden rhetoric for the last few months.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

If you think leftists “just” shifted to hating Biden, I’ve got news for you. In fact, I don’t know anybody, I mean ANYbody on the left that has nothing but distain for Biden for the last several years. Did you ever consider that people are allowed different opinions from you without being paid operatives.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If Trump wins then all these "Genocide Joe" people are going to learn the real meaning of that term, that's for sure.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Are you suggesting that half a million people being intentionally starved somehow doesn’t constitute a genocide?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, but I am suggesting that if Joe Biden isn't still president this time next year, then there's a good chance everyone in Gaza will be either dead or Israeli by then.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (12 children)

I'm convinced they're just astroturfers. One of the many voter suppression tactics of the right.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not a tankie. I don't want the US to collapse and burn, that's going to end badly for a lot of people. I want us to reform and do better, though I'm now convinced that that's not going to happen. I point this stuff out because I don't think Biden can win. I didn't think he could win last time, in all fairness, but he was and is a weak candidate, whose only shot lies in the democrats making the gamble that his opponent is weaker, which is kind of a stupid gamble to make imo. I don't want Trump to win, I want the democrats to hit the republicans like a run away steam engine and smash this fascist bullshit into the dirt. I WANT NOTHING MORE THAN FOR RONALD REAGAN'S GRAVE TO BELCH BLACK SMOKE FOR A WEEK STRAIGHT THIS NOVEMBER. Instead we're gambling if the guy who would have got sent home from being a Wal-Mart greeter with his debate performance can beat the guy who wants to hold military tribunals for political opposition. When Biden loses, I'm going to skullfuck the first Democrat who high-mindedly tells me this is really the fault of people not voting for their guy. No shit, do you want a gold star for that? Turns out when people don't vote for candidates, they don't win, whoda thunk it? Apparently not the goddamn DNC, since they keep seeing the ever-lowering RNC bar as an excuse to run correspondingly worse candidates each year instead of running a rock star that would shatter the Republicans. OH, what's that, the republicans have opened a portal to Hell and are running just Hitler and Charlie Manson for their ticket? Oh boy, Joe Biden might be too far left to win against that, we better see if we can get the actual corpses of Milton Friedman and Henry Kissinger to run for us. Fuck off. Of course people aren't excited to vote for a shitty candidate, because they're a shitty candidate. Get someone who can speak in complete sentences for God's sake.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (13 children)

My friend, I hear ya. And I agree. But you need to know that the time for those discussions was both years ago and constant, just not now.

We are 5 minutes to curtain.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't want trump, I've said before that I think that his complicity in Gaza isn't only abhorrent but will lose him the election. Not exactly a stretch to then say "Oh and it turns out he is sunsetting too?" It sure seems like somebody else would be a better call to again not have trump. Give me Whitmer, Warren, Buttigieg, Duckworth, Ocasio-Cortez, Warnock, or Abrams and I'll be happy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (6 children)

But it’s just not that simple. Israel is inextricable from a huge area of US power in the region - for better or the obvious worse that’s the case. We’ve been given what we’ve been given. If you think we should shut down all ties and delete the existing structure, say that. The ramifications may not be wonderful, particularly if one is unfamiliar with what those ramifications are.

And. AGAIN. As we know Trump has suggested Israel nuke them, he’s 100% on board for complete displacement, and I’ll bet large dollars he’ll collect real estate in the ensuing debacle. Biden is THE option. Trump or Biden. Certain death or a good government.

Every other conversation at this time is secondary at best, or in many cases deliberately inflammatory at worst.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›