this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
58 points (95.3% liked)

Canada

9587 readers
2043 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's silly to use the geographical map of Canada to show election results. Land doesn't vote, people do.

Image source: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/28/world/canada/results-canada-federal-election.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

In the states, the land actually votes. California has 40 times more citizens than South Dakota. But they both get two senators. And we don’t elect our president by popular vote, but by state electors. That’s probably why election maps in many North American English markets fall into this trap.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Making first past the post worse is a challenge. I'm proud of Americans for raising the bar of terrible voting systems

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

and with a minimum amount of electors per state, land votes in the electoral college, too!

i hate it and now i feel bad

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A tiny bit true here in Canada too as not every riding has the same number of people, with some smaller ridings having 1/4 to 1/5 as many people as the more populous ones. That said, it's in our constitution that more ridings are created as the population grows so the problem is much more diluted, and having a slight tilt to the less populous areas helps offset the "tyranny of majority" that can happen when it's "fair". All in all, I think it's a decent system