theacharnian

Strange how this talk of "collateral" damage only applies to when Israelis kill civilians and not when, say, Hamas or Hezbollah do it.

Using your own despicable and dehumanizing approach, October the 7th merely had 797 "collateral victims" for the 379 legitimate Israeli security forces targets. And after all, the 2:1 civilian to military casualties ratio is basically the same as the IDF's own record in Gaza.

Ah what to do, such is war...

No.

Fuck that barbaric way of devaluing the loss of human life.

Source: IDF said trust me bro.

Netanyahu desperately needs a regional war. How many people must die so that this bag of shit doesn't face an Israeli judge for his scandals?

If the third parties abide by Brazilian law, they should have legal representation in the country and therefore can be pursued for circumventing the law?

And your evidence that Israel only targetted active duty Hezbollah combattants?

What a load of ghoulish warmongering. Oh it's war? If Hezbollah had done this to Israelis, the world would be crying blood and vowing for Israel's right to defend itself.

Jew media

Fuck off.

So, like, are Israeli reservists fair game for terror attacks?

None of them electoral politicians, like the ones we're talking about here. Try again.

I've heard that the young'uns call "ohio" things that are weird and cringey.

I thought originally that you were suggesting a simple syntactic manipulation of the fraction but you're not. I don't understand why the equation you propose is reasonable.

The amount "civilians" in your calculations is tricky. The first time it appears it refers to dead civilians, the second time it appears to the overall civilian population (hence the 1/2 using the rule of thumb that half of Gazans are under 18).

I.e you can't say

#deadKids/#allDead = #deadCivilians/#allDead * #deadKids/#allCivilians

Because #deadCivilians << #allCivilians