this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
603 points (96.5% liked)

Greentext

6342 readers
1377 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Buddhism's "Life sucks? Be nice and die and you'll get a better one" sucks but it's still better than "you should be nice to others, but that's too much to ask so go be as awful as you want and just regret it later and that'll be fine". But even that was better than whatever the fuck people are interpreting from religions these days.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Before Christianty it was also a lot of "killing people is just really fucking cool, actually", which even as an atheist I still admit was worse.

Not that Christians didn't.

But they made some sort-of-safe havens.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Spanish missions have entered the chat. They actually sent people back to Spain when they said "yo, maybe Jesus wouldn't be cool with us enslaving and murdering the locals".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Entered the chat" is a stupid phrase.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. Personally I don't see life as being "sacred" or anything and I think people should ultimately be free to choose to end their own if they really want to (provided they also get good support for trying to deal with whatever leads to that choice) - but it kinda scares me that this "sanctity" that is attributed to life is the only thing stopping people from being casually OK with murder.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Perhaps it depends on your definition of sacred. Life is the only mechanism that we know of by which the universe understands itself. If you ascribe to free will, life is the only mechanism able to change the course of events that were initiated by the Big Bang. If you don’t ascribe to free will, then it is the only mechanism able to witness the course of events that were initiated by the Big Bang.

That seems like something worth preserving in large, even if an individual life should be ended for compassion or justice. A life doesn’t have to be sacred, but Life seems pretty sacred to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then came the great religion of Arabian desert which made killing people cool again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Uh... It didn't?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if Buddhism is particularly concerned with being nice

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What the actual fuck are you talking about? Go educate yourself

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Excuse me, if you actually understand the path and believe the point is being "nice", then why the fuck are you talking to me like that? And if you don't understand the path, then again, why the fuck are you talking to me like that?

The eightfold path concerns "right" or "wise" or "virtuous" action... but what do those have to do with being "nice"?? Haven't you heard that light and dark create one another?