Comment105

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the quick way to filter them is a quick way to piss off Metacritic users.

How the fuck can you claim to have read what I wrote?

That kind of removal would be unpopular, a lot of people would drop Metacritic fast.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

That's where we're going to focus the problem solving, when that's how you choose to stir shit up. We're going to focus on preventing climate activists from destroying shit, and we're going to talk about how to punish them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

You didn't read what I wrote.

You only saw the disagreement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Your dad is a real motherfucker, Lally.

If my advice means anything, don't get reunited.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Is that really the smart thing?

I'm fairly confident that would be about as good for them as shooting themselves in the foot.

You have to realize what world you're living in. These people and their agreeing friends aren't just a loud minority, just yesterday they demonstrated something that really should have informed your worldview more than it seems to have, given what you suggest here. That kind of removal would be unpopular, a lot of people would drop Metacritic fast.

To an extent I agree with them, in that they ruined the tone of the game, but unlike these reviewers I personally think developers are allowed to make standalone slop. It doesn't ruin anything I've bought from them before.

Finally by all reasonable accounts it absolutely is a woke, pronoun-conscious, DEI focused game. Those words wouldn't even really be out of place if one showed up in a positive review.

You have to learn to think before you make yourself more unpopular.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

I'm from Estonian Lemmy, and I'm not even Estonian!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same. Idiots make it less, not more likely to see actual change.

If I went out and smeared yogurt in the face of every kid in a stroller to call attention to the cause, please stop me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Don't worry, they'll start being forced to read the good book in school some time next year.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

Whether it was him or one of the other guys, one thing is clear; This gay guy wants to fuck twinks harder than the US government fucked Bin Laden.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Hollywood superstar Shia Labeouf?

 

It is at 361,826 out of 1,000,000 signatures with the remaining trickle after the initial spike nowhere near the pace needed to hit the mark before the 31st of July 2025.

(https://www.reddit.com/r/StopKillingGames/comments/1flaevi/let_me_put_the_current_campaign_progress_into_a/)

I interpret the state of Ross Scott's SKG campaign like this:
It's pretty clear that democratically speaking, we do not object to companies arbitrarily removing access to purchased video games. Only a minority objects to it.

While it will stay up and get more signatures, there will ultimately be no follow-through to this campaign. The reality is that it's not politically sound, it's not built on a foundation of a real public desire for change. In other words, voters don't want it. You might, but most of your family and friends don't want it.

 

Is it just random letters arrived to by keyboard mashing like a lot of federated websites seem, or is there any thought behind it?

 

It's always particularly nice and soft the first time you put it on, but the one I got most recently is so bad it leaves a thin but thorough coat of black fur on my arms when I take it off. What's the production methods used when making sweaters like this?

 

"help" just means "a conversation"

and that really doesn't make a difference

worse, it's like you're saying "If you have cancer, treatment is available." but what you're actually offering is a daily bowl of fairly healthy soup. you're running exaggerated, optimistic advertising.

 

It was amazing for a decade or two, but now the night scares me, I do not know what awaits us in the morning.

view more: next ›