this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
687 points (93.9% liked)

politics

19607 readers
3681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"If the purges [of potential voters], challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast."

"[...] Democracy can win* despite the 2.3% suppression headwind.

And that’s our job as Americans: to end the purges, the vigilante challenges, the ballot rejections and the attitude that this is all somehow OK."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The problem is that Democrats fail to demonstrate that voting for them is better than not voting at all to a large part of the electorate.

That's where the propaganda and foreign influence come in. Their entire effort centered around muddying the waters so people couldn't be sure what the reality was. And voter suppression certainly makes it easier for people to say fuck it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, there was foreign propaganda, influence, psyops, etc.

Look at Luigi. All of that propaganda failed to contain a very wide, bipartisan swathe of the population who was elated at the CEO's death. Even more moderate people agreed that healthcare sucks even if they don't like people, even murderers, gunned down in the street.

And Democrats still refuse to run on a platform of complete healthcare reform. And before you say "but Republicans would vote it down", make them! Put it forward every week, every session, make a presidential run on it, make overreaching executive orders that fuck with insurance companies, forcing them to sue, every week. Have random low ranking Democrats make speeches about "well Luigi was in the wrong, but such things are inevitable in this system" to get in the papers with controversy. Just like Reps did it with the wall and other stupid stuff. Make it every week's topic who exactly is standing in the way of establishing a proper healthcare system.

And there are other issues like that. Cost of living for example.

Fight, damnit, do something, or you will lose your country.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Do you remember Obamacare and Republicans voting to repeal it literally hundreds of times? Where did that get us?

And now we have less control of the government. We can't even force a vote. The speaker can just refuse to allow it. There is no fight we can win. The best we can hope for is slowing the destruction.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And now we have less control of the government.

You are looking at solutions within the system. Those are not the only solutions. When the system is rotten, go around it.

There is no fight we can win if we acquiesce to the rules imposed on us by the oppressors. That has always been true throughout history. And yet progress is often made.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Until Trump won a second time, there was still a possibility of fixing this within the system. You may be right that there is no solution within the system now. Finding a solution outside the system will bring violence and suffering beyond anything most living people have experienced, so I'm not exactly eager to give up on other methods.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's my point. Instead of the Republicans voting hundreds of times to repeal it, Democrats should have been voting to expand it, anchoring the debate away from Reps. They should have thrown in a massive expansion, and forced a vote around that, again, hundreds of times.

This is not even going low, just fighting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You’re exactly right. Instead of going on the offense the Dems just think “well this won’t pass so why bother?”

Meanwhile the Republicans are out here writing bills to give Trump a third term. Do you think the fact that it won’t pass matters one iota to them?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The third-term bullshit is just performative ass-licking.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I agree, but it appeals to their base. It’s blatantly unconstitutional but that makes no difference to the electorate who will eat it up.

The Dems refuse to play the game and then blame the voters when their boring status quo approach doesn’t get anyone fired up. It can’t be all on us little people to do their jobs for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

73 days. That's how long the Dems held the filibuster-proof trifecta that allowed Obamacare in the first place. They haven't had the power to force anything through since. It took everything they could do just to defend what little progress they made. The tactic you are talking about can't work if the other side can just filibuster everything.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

There is no fight we can win. The best we can hope for is slowing the destruction.

This is the attitude whether we give Democrats a majority to squander or not.