Technology

59091 readers

4107 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

547

Adobe's Employees Are Just As Upset at the Company As Its Users: Report (petapixel.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Adobe’s employees are typically of the same opinion of the company as its users, having internally already expressed concern that AI could kill the jobs of their customers. That continued this week in internal discussions, where exasperated employees implored leadership to not let it be the “evil” company customers think it is.

This past week, Adobe became the subject of a public relations firestorm after it pushed an update to its terms of service that many users saw at best as overly aggressive and at worst as a rights grab. Adobe quickly clarified it isn’t spying on users and even promised to go back and adjust its terms of service in response.

For many though, this was not enough, and online discourse surrounding Adobe continues to be mostly negative. According to internal Slack discussions seen by Business Insider, as before, Adobe’s employees seem to be siding with users and are actively complaining about Adobe’s poor communications and inability to learn from past mistakes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's what it is with a union too, it's just more organized. You can strike without a union, it's just a lot harder to organize and the stakes are way higher.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And with a union, you have legal protection. Individually, you don't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. Private unions exist and don't have legal protection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've never heard of private unions, so I googled. Sounds like it's just a union at a private company? That's probably the vast majority of unions. And yes, they have protection under the NLRA.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

You're right! I didn't realize individual workers and informal unions had a right to strike.

But their protections are a lot more limited than public unions, like the teachers or police unions. If you're striking for better pay or conditions, it seems you can be replaced and, depending on circumstances, fired without legal repercussions, whereas if it's for unfair labor practices, you have more protections.

But you do have a lot more legal protections than I thought, so that's good to know.