this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
260 points (85.3% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
3398 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
260
How a 27-Year-Old Codebreaker Busted the Myth of Bitcoin’s Anonymity (www.wired.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"This is the story of the revelation in late 2013 that Bitcoin was, in fact, the opposite of untraceable—that its blockchain would actually allow researchers, tech companies, and law enforcement to trace and identify users with even more transparency than the existing financial system."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have never even heard of any of the publicly available blockchain forensics databases, or reviewed any of the ample examples of reporting and analysis on the subject.

That's not what I asked about and you know it.

I asked how you know about vendor money laundering techniques, which you failed to provide a source for.

it’s extremely well covered

If that's the case, then you should be able to easily provide a source instead of flailing around like you're doing now.

so stop being a lazy twat and look for yourself.

You made the claim. You provide the source or you admit you're making stuff up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you actually asking someone to prove that large darknet market drug dealers use money laundering to safely access their profits?

It sounds like what you really want is someone to explain to you how it's done successfully...if you're that desperate to learn, take it to Dread and off Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm asking for a source for their information.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I just gave you a primary source for that...and a lot more...

Dread

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Are you going to link to a specific post, or just the whole forum and pretend that satisfies the criteria of 'source'?

Hey guys! I found a source for everything! It's called Google. Just cite it at the end of all your papers.

Why is it so difficult for you people to admit you make stuff up without a source? Lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're something special.

Okay kid, if this was all about you wanting to feel like you won an argument because people are declining to act as your personal Spotify Crime Explained playlist generator, then you win.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago

Why is it so difficult for you people to admit you make stuff up without a source? Lol.