thefool

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can I join this club even though I don't have an Air?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

You are correct.

Source: a different ex Christian

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Huh that's strange because I've never had the driver break on me.

But I guess it means you've successfully installed the new card? Awesome

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Might be a bit late of a reply, but I was able to install the Broadcom drivers super easy on my 2013 MBP. I know, different laptop, but same driver.

After installing Manjaro, KDE Neon, and Kubuntu, here's what I did:

I paired it with my phone and shared my internet connection, then downloaded the Broadcom driver in the repo. Done!

I also installed Aurora (Fedora immutable distro) on it, and the Broadcom drivers were already installed, so it just worked, but every time my laptop went to sleep it crashed and I had to hold the power button to start it, so I gave up on that and installed Neon

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I've had several machines that refuse to update because of error 0x.

In fact, one of my kids has that happening right now.

At least that part is not isolated to OP. It doesn't happen to me anymore since I switched to Linux about a year ago

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Ahhh yes. Good thing it's non-binding

 

Hi folks,

I downloaded Aurora (https://getaurora.dev/) the other day with the intention of installing it on my 2013 MacBook Pro.

It wasn't until I got to the install screen when I realized that I have no networking.

I currently have Manjaro installed on this laptop, and I remember having to connect via Bluetooth to my phone to download and the Broadcom BCM4360 drivers.

Is there a good way to bake that into the image prior to installing?

Either that or I can try downloading the driver over Bluetooth again, but then I'll need to use a command to somehow layer it on top of the existing image? (rpm-ostree?)

Sorry if I'm missing some command or documentation, but it is a little more confusing trying out these immutable distros.

Has anyone else out there run into this issue and worked around it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I've had a couple of passengers open the door using the latch because they didn't know about the Open Door button.

I'm not saying it's a good design (it's dumb) but you can get out when there is no power

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Thanks for mentioning Wyze.. looks awesome.

I ended up with a shitty Arlo set that I overpaid for, and the worst part is that they no longer sell the station where you can save video to the local network, meaning I'd have to pay for a subscription

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

There's a release latch on the doors beside the "open door" buttons. I guess no I've else is pointing that out?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I played this almost 40 years ago on an Apple IIe when I was 10-11 years old, made it all the way to the final dungeon, then just.. gave up. I don't know why. Maybe I was unprepared for the final dungeon and was too lazy to leave and get more supplies?

I recently thought about doing a replay of it to see how it holds up

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Tesla driver here.

When I first heard the announcement that they were going vision-only, I thought ah shit they're boned.

I replied on maybe a Reddit thread (?) that there was no way it'll work up north in any kind of snowy conditions, and people called me an idiot etc

Fast forward a few years later, when I got to experience it first hand. Anytime I drive the car at night, warnings pop up on the screen like "front left camera is blocked or blinded" Cue Surprised Pikachu. In the snow, sometimes it can't even detect a road.

I tried the free trial of FSD and, while it's a neat gimmick, I think I was able to make maybe one or two short trips (2km) without needing to disengage it.

It was really bad

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

This worked! thank you

 

We have a few sites on our intranet at work that I constantly end up searching on Google instead of visiting the site.

If I type in the address bar

https://site.work/customers/12345

it will navigate just fine, but if I just type

site.work/customers/12345

it executes a Google search

Is there any way for me to add a whitelist for a given hostname? I don't want to turn keyword.enabled off.. I only want to turn it off for one site.

view more: next ›