remotelove

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
196
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

The lead would make the bacon a bit sweeter and should mask the gunpowder undertones.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

A well maintained and in-spec AR is phenomenal. Jim Bob's AR he bought on sale from BCA is going to be a piece of shit. (I had one of their bolts dissolve on me once.)

The tricky bit is getting one that is actually in-spec. The original blueprints are good, but the way they are laid out gives manufacturers too much wiggle room and can be a bit more difficult to read. This leads to a slew of problems when you have people jamming together random bits from different sources.

It's a versatile weapon and I like them when properly engineered and properly maintained. It absolutely isn't the end-all-be-all and it's embarrassing to see it in the hands of idiots who just want to make a political statement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you compute for air in the barrel after calling out there was no air in space? Just curious about that, s'all.

With that, there would be a hell of a suction on the bullet after the cartridge was fired. Also, the detonation doesn't happen all in one go and continues as the bullet moves to the muzzle. (I did quite a bit of experimenting with that to reduce muzzle flash, actually.) So, the bullet is accelerating until the pressure is released when the bullet passes the muzzle.

While air in the barrel isn't really a factor on earth, surrounding air pressure absolutely is. It affects burn rate most but how it affects burn rate is a characteristic of the powder itself. (In zero-G, I would speculate a slower burn because the powder would be more prone to floating if it wasn't a compressed load.)

When I plan to go to lower altitudes, I typically use lighter loads or I risk over-pressure conditions. (I'll basically just compute for a couple hundred pounds less pressure chamber.)

After all that, I have no fucking clue what would happen in space because the conditions are so wonky.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Those were words, yes.

How the fuck you were able to mash them together like that is beyond me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Failure modes were not considered.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's one of the better bad designs, in some cases. Something, something self-regulating air flow. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, I suppose.

If there was any intelligence involved in our design, it was similar to a kid buying aftermarket parts for his car on eBay that then strapped them to one or two bits of ultra high grade equipment. The end result is something like a nice Supra that drives around town making weird farting noises.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (11 children)

I heard this was actually by design. Nostrils should naturally alternate maximum blowage capacity.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasal_cycle

(It gets worse when you are congested?)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I know that is abused for lots of crap autogenerated YouTube videos.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

De-escalation is easy: Russia can get the fuck out of Ukraine. All of it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Just pretend you are partially deaf and crank the volume to 11.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I just ignored all the ads and any news, so you are likely correct. I did think that most of the games were mobile, but I must have been mistaken in thinking it was playable on Netflix clients on your TV or something.

I used to play Pac-Man on my old FireTV with the controller while I was killing time in the mornings before work, so I thought it was similar in that regard.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

Over the last few years, I have been thinking a ton about this style of article. They are riddled with phrases like "this shouldn't be possible", "breaks the laws of physics", "it's an impossible structure", or something along those lines.

While these phrases are partially click-bait and partially awe inspiring, I am starting to think that the approach we are taking for estimating the massive scale of things in the universe may be extremely flawed.

I don't claim to be a physicist or anything like that and am just your average internet idiot. However, it seems to me that working these problems in reverse might help. Our existing observations of the universe just seem to always put artificial caps on some problems, s'all.

So, let's take the most massive black hole we know of and then multiply it's mass by say, a few million times. Immediately, there will be a barrage of people who would post a million (probably legitimate) counter points as to why that wouldn't even be possible to begin with.

It seems that given enough time, we eventually find some "impossible" things.

While it's easy so get lost in constraints like the possible age of the universe, likely theories of early black hole formation, etc... It seems that Occam's Razor might be getting lost somewhere. I mean, even with all of our existing data that says otherwise, there is that thing that was impossible. It's right there! What would it take to form that thing even if the conditions seem absurd?

 
 

Howdy y'all! I am diving extremely deep into mycology and am on a quest to catch up on all modern research on the subject. I recently discovered 21st Century Guidebook to Fungi (Free from the authors!! https://www.davidmoore.org.uk/21st_century_guidebook_to_fungi_platinum/) but I need MORE! I'll list out some conditions and wants to see if that gets me in the right direction.

  • I am looking for fairly advanced books that are college level or higher.

  • Diversity of authors and research is awesome. (Conflicting data between books is also not a problem as this is a "relatively new" field of study.)

  • Detailed information about genetics, breeding, etc.. Information about different methods to breed and cross fungi would be a huge plus. (I am entering this hobby with a minimal understanding of genetics. I do understand that Mendel only scratched the surface on genetics with highly controlled studies about peas and his theories have a metric ton of caveats.)

  • If anyone can recommend a good "bible" for mushroom identification, that would be great. I have one, but it is lacking. Any phone apps I have found are OK, but those are better supported with core knowledge first, me thinks. (Side note: I have been hearing rumors that identification of fungi may be slowly changing. While classification has typically been by fruit characteristics, that might not be the full story.)

  • Aside from a focus on genetics and identification, what books have you found to be super interesting? (How to Change Your Mind or Fantastic Fungi would be examples of something in the "interesting" category and may only be slightly related to mushrooms.)

  • What universities are on the forefront of research of fungi and psychedelics? UC Davis, UC Berkeley and a couple others have been releasing lectures and studies recently that are super interesting. (As a side-topic, I am enamored by the potential of psychedelics. While there is a great deal of spiritual self discovery to be had, I am super interested in the science behind it all.)

Thanks in advance for any information dump you can provide here!

 

For my conditions, it seems that 50/50 hardwood saw dust/wheat bran is performing better than standard masters mix. It's probably a hair too humid for it in my tent, but it's gotta be higher for the oysters that are fruiting now.

(That is a 5lb block of substrate)

 
 
 
 

There is a ton of anecdotal evidence on the interwebs about the photosensitivity of fungi, ie, it governs the direction of pin growth, fruit colors, etc. suggesting a circadian rhythm of sorts.

There are older papers out there that do document light sensitivity in the red/blue ranges. However, none that I found have actually documented chemical changes in the fruit itself, just the changes in the structure of the fruit. (If I remember correctly, it was around 100 species that have been documented as photosensitive to some degree.)

I personally have debunked monotub side pinning being caused by light. Compaction of the substrate and limiting moisture exposure to the sides of a mycelium cake has all but eliminated side pinning for me. I digress.

So, I am just looking for new studies and research papers on this subject. Eventually, I will probably conduct my own experiments, but that is for another day.

Cheers!

 

I had a bit of grain left during my last run, so I mixed the bits I had left.

This is interesting, actually. Over the next few months, I'll continue this experiment to see what grain mixes might work better for spawn.

While this wasn't a "proper" test, I had still hypothesized that the higher starch content in the popcorn would do better. I guess not.

I'll try and separate testing into different categories like starch content, moisture content, mycelium strain, etc. There is probably a ton more conditions to isolate as well.

 
 

I am doing research into setting up a mini farm for gourmet and medicinal mushrooms and am currently looking into long term mycelium storage.

On the surface, the answers seem simple: Once the mycelium runs out of nutrients, it dies. So mor food mor better? However..

Slants seem to be the #1 recommended long term storage method. However, the most economical types of slants I can get seem to hold about as much agar as your standard petri dish.

Questions that come to mind:

  • Is the goal of a slant to reduce the propagation of mycelium to save on its nutrient supply?
  • Is there a measurable difference in nutrient uptake between the different methods?
  • Does it all just boil down to which method is more space efficient for storage?
  • What questions do I really need to be asking myself in the context of this thread? ;)

Regardless, I think I will have to "update" or "refresh" my cultures every 12-18 months by transferring the mycelium to fresh media. Correct?

(Obviously, for substrate inoculation, the different methods have their own benefits which I am already aware of.)

view more: ‹ prev next ›