inb4_FoundTheVegan

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Beat ya to it.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Yup. That's super gross. I totally agree.

But, probably not for the same reason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Well that's dissapointing. You don't want to discuss AI and art, but to call names.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

but c'mon people. Think.

You need to take your own advice and think on the context of arts commercial useage and the truth that every human exists because of past human accomplishments.

In terms of human perspective with digital tools AI's difference of scale is a difference of kind. Photoshop fundamentally didn't change the process and concept of producing images. It's still a human sitting down with tools and producing art based off their ideas and rendered with their skill.

But AI removes that human process, now a string of keywords will mash up existing art to make a facsimile of something unique. AI doesn't make anything new, it fundamentally can't, therefore not really art. All of human culture is standing on the shoulders of historical giants, you and I can have this conversation because of someone else inventing computers, which exist because of someone utilizing electricity, which was only possible by the wheel, only possible by fire etc.

However I don't think there is much to gain in criticism of an artist buying their paints from a store just as there isn't any in artists using a mouse. Their perspective, skill and talent will produce something new, inspired by others undoubtedly, but not copy pasting brushstrokes. I hope we agree that's plagerisn and intrinsically not unique.

This is all philosophy of existentialism, what IS art and when does it become something else? The artistsy of the writers, painters and editors is what produces a compelling end multi generational international product like DND. Which is different than an end user using AI to spice up a character sheet inside the privacy of their own home.

AI is a wonderful tool, but only if the end use doesn't really matter. My players and I don't care about 11 fingered elves, but I'd be pissed to see that in a book I paid $50+ for. Just as I would be upset to read flavor text that recruisve of past writing or game mechanics designed by a machine incapable of actually running a session. If you are charging for a product, human artistry should be involved, anything else is free so who cares. Removing the human factor is the rubicon that changes digital art to high concept machine assisted plagerism.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 days ago (10 children)

"I'm probably more excited though about the playful elements of AI," he said. "I play with probably 30 or 40 people regularly. There's not a single person who doesn't use AI somehow for either campaign development or character development or story ideas. That's a clear signal that we need to be embracing it."

So as a DM and Player, yes, there are uses for AI. Generating a good character portrait as opposed to scouring search engines is the obvious one. But I also had good useage with putting my loose outline in to AI story generators, while it only produced garbage cliches that I didn't use. It was a good way to brainstorm and see different angles of my original idea.

Having said all that, I super duper don't want AI to become a core part of DND/MTG, art in products should be ACTUAL art by ACTUAL artists. Not my 8 fingered free placeholder nonsense. I truly struggle to think of a good way that hasbro could be using AI that would help the game.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

I still believe 9/11 was an inside job or at least high level officials, including Bush, were aware it was going to happen

Crazy talk. This was absolutely not a widely held opinion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

The Life Aquatic. I just absolutely adore the sad, disappointed and fragile characters. Fuckin hilarious!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

As a pineapple on pizza enjoyer I am not gonna judge, taste is subjective so no one but you decides what goes on your food. Honestly, this is how new recipes are made. If no one tried new variations then we wouldn't have most of our favorites!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

2004

There is a pretty decent chance I saw that on the day it was posted. I feel old. 😔

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (10 children)

The shooting happened when Gardner pulled out a revolver, intending to fire a blank round into the air to signal the start of the outdoor ceremony

No fucking reason to shoot a live gun into the air. This alone should be charged as reckless endangerment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

thys thrad js dumb, WHY wuld u mAke thys?!?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm thankful my father was so insistent on teaching me to type properly. At the time I was super annoyed at him putting a cardboard cutout over the keyboard so I couldn't see keys. But touch typing has been a boon ever since, I doubt dad was prepping me for typing quickly mid-game but it sure is nice!

view more: ‹ prev next ›